Bread and Puppet Theatre returns to campus

Gabriel Herrell of Bread and Puppet Theater waves a baton during Sunday’s performance.
Gabriel Herrell of Bread and Puppet Theater waves a baton during Sunday’s performance.
By Jane Suttmeier
Photo Editor

The Bread and Puppet Theatre returned to Ohio Wesleyan on March 24 for a performance of “The Circus of the Possibilitarians.”

Bread and Puppet, which calls their circus, “Possibilitarian – the complete everything everywhere dance circus,” was brought to OWU by The House of Peace and Justice (P&J), the Department of Theatre and Dance, the Humanities /Classics Department, Amnesty International and the Wesleyan Council on Student Affairs.

Senior Leif Sayvetz of P&J was the one who initiated their return; their last performance was about two and a half years ago.

“That would have been my first semester here and this is my last semester here, and if I had left no one would know them anymore,” said Sayvetz. “This is kind of the last chance because no one really in this school has seen them, part of the reason was to remind people they exist.”

Bread and Puppet Theatre was founded by Peter Schumann in New York in 1963, but the company is now based in Glover, Vt., according to its website.

The company brought five members – Gabriel Harrell, Erin Bell, Cavan Meese, Esteli Kitchen and Katherine Nook – in a bus full of props, set and costumes for the show. Harrell said staying in one place for two nights is a luxury.
The company performed its show with a volunteer contingent of current and future P&J residents and other students, all dressed in white.

“We pulled it all together in a day with the volunteers; normally we would come in in the afternoon, rehearse, perform and then head back out,” he said.

Harrell said the Bread and Puppet Theatre is hard to define, but he said several different elements come together to create a circus of possibilities.

“It’s hard to say exactly to distill it down to a sentence but it’s politically conscious theatre,” Harrell said.
“We try to deal with political topics in an accessible and exciting way, to spark political and social discourse through theater.”

The production on Sunday addressed topics like fracking, student debt, god and nuclear warfare.

“(A)s the news changes, we create new acts and bring them into the show, or all of a sudden an act is irrelevant we’ll take it out,” Harrell said.

There are many aspects that make up the Bread and Puppet Theatre. They incorporate puppetry, song, dance, “cheap art,” stilts, politics, clowns, trapeze, as well as acting and the tradition of baking and breaking bread with the audiences.

“We give you a piece of bread with the puppet show because our bread and theater belong together,” said a piece of artwork branded by Bread and Puppet. “Theater is different. It is more like bread, more like a necessity.”
Puppeteer and musician Meese, who performed on stilts during the show, said they make the bread personally during their tour.

“We’ve been baking on the road, so we had a couple stops that we knew we could bake at,” he said. “We carry the starter, the rye and the grind, and we carry it with us.”

After the show, the cast served a rye bread to the audience with homemade garlic aioli.

The five members call themselves “The Dire Circumstance Jubilation Ensemble,” and play music on instruments such as the saxophone, sousaphone and drums during their act.

Puppeteer Erin Bell said she has been playing the sousaphone for about 7 years.

Junior Erika Nininger, a member of P&J who participated along with her housemates and other volunteers, said the Bread and Puppet puppeteers had been performing for a long time.

“This is their 50th Anniversary, and they update it every year with events, international and national,” she said. “It’s always changing.”

Harrell said he has been a part of the theatre for 11 years.

“I used to be full time, and now I am just in and out,” he said.

Kitchen said she used to be an intern with the company, one of 50 the company takes every summer in Vermont.

“I was an intern 6 years ago but I have been doing it full time ever since,” she said.

Art from the Bread and Puppet Press
Art from the Bread and Puppet Press
Along with entertainment, the company sells “cheap art” as a way to make extra money on the road, as well as spread the company’s ideals of what art should be. Meese said the Bread and Puppet “press” sells all of the theater’s artwork.

“The cheap art table is us and our friends,” he said. “A bunch of us make stuff in that style. …We distribute that stuff because it’s cool and then so the puppeteers can make a little extra cash.”

Harrell said they carve a lot of their own work, and then create prints for cheap.

Sayvetz said one of the reasons P&J brought the company back to OWU was its “cheap art” influence.

“We used to do cheap art projects on our own without them for a couple years after, but the projects kind of died down,” he said. “People just didn’t know who they were anymore, so hopefully this will spark some interest.”

Senior Anni Liu said the art is not unfamiliar to her.

“These (cheap artworks) are all over our house, so it looks like Peace and Justice,” she said.

The political circus did not incorporate elephants and balancing acts, but the Bread and Puppet team said they did not want people to think of it as just a “play.”

“Traditionally the circus was just horse, equestrian routines,” Harrell said. “So there is the horse act, the standard dancing bears, a couple clown acts.”

The “circus” aspect does come through the horse costumes that the volunteers wore.

“(There is) definitely a homage in some kind of way to circus horses,” Nook said. “It has a lot to do with tradition and of a three ring circus and a one ring circus and that’s kind of where the word (circus) comes from. The whole production that we put on during the summer as kind of a circus it’s like performance happening in a field in the middle of nowhere.”

Nininger agreed that the circus plays an important role in Bread and Puppet Theatre.

“It’s mainly a circus group, and I think it’s supposed to invoke political and critical thinking,” she said. “Just bring up national issues in an engaging kind of way.”

Liu participated in Bread and Puppet Theatre as one of P&J’s last projects before she graduates.

“I joined in because I wanted to do political theatre that involved humor,” she said.

Senior Joe Lugosch said he doesn’t really pay attention to the politics, but as a theater major he appreciates the work that Bread and Puppet does.

“Personally I am away from any extreme, but I think the whole process and what they’re doing is cool and I’m enjoying being around it,” he said. “It’s a totally different experience.”

Freshman Camille Mullins- Lemieux, who will live in P&J next year, said the short notice for the rehearsal surprised her, but she felt it was a once-in-a- lifetime experience.

“I’m really lucky to be a part of it, I like how joyous it is.” she said. “It’s entertaining but has a lot of depth.”

Sound Off OWU: What do you think of the new Pope?

Female students dominate programs, courses abroad

By Rachel Vinciguerra
Transcript Correspondent

Although OWU is considered “the opposite of ordinary,” since their inception in 2009-2010, travel-learning courses reflect national trends in female-dominated study-abroad programs.

Darrell Albon, the director of international and off-campus programs, echoed this consistency with national trends as well as a contributing factor of a gender imbalance of enrollment.

“Here at OWU more women than men apply to participate and participate in the Travel Learning Course program,” Albon said. “The same is true of semester-long study abroad. This reflects national trends and is magnified just a bit by the fact that there are more women than men enrolled at OWU.”

The Institute of International Education found in 2008 that women enrolled in colleges nationwide were about twice as likely as their male counterparts to take part in study-abroad opportunities. And although OWU’s study-abroad opportunities tend to be more numerous and involved than those of many comparable universities, one-half of the student body is missing the boat.

Sociology Professor John Durst said in his experience with travel-learning he has found this national trend to be true.

“In the travel-learning I know, in the course connection I am coordinator of, there is no question whatsoever that there are overwhelmingly more female applicants.”

Durst said he is uncomfortable with the gender bias in travel-learning courses.

“It bothers me,” he said. “I don’t know what it is about this notion of extending the university beyond the walls of Delaware, Ohio and to interdisciplinary course connections that we’re missing.”

Albon said there are many factors that he has seen contribute to students’ decisions to study abroad in some capacity.

” Choice of major and minor programs, participation in inter-collegiate athletics, and participation in on-campus co-curricular activities (for both genders) are factors in the choice to study abroad for a semester,” Albon said.

But admitted that more women do utilize study-abroad opportunities than men, although he said he does not have exact data on those trends at this time.

Durst said he is not bothered by the fact many women are taking advantage of these travel opportunities, rather, he said he is bothered by the lack of male interest.

“I don’t think these are bad guys,” Durst said. “It just seems to be that we’re not reaching them as well.”

Senior Margaret Argiro is currently enrolled in a travel-learning course, called “The Sociology of Knowledge”, which will travel to England and Scotland in May. She said her class is entirely female.

“I think it could alter the experience,” she said. “Having such a female-dominated group might dictate what you do or how you interact with the people and culture you study in.”

Argiro said she studied abroad in Tanzania her sophomore year and experienced the same phenomenon. Her program was made up of ten women and two men.

“It was still a really good experience,” she said. “But it’s the whole idea of wearing a wedding ring in a bar. Sometimes it is helpful to have guys along.”

Argiro said she thought the biggest impact of having only a few men in travel-learning courses, and other study-abroad opportunities, was that it could add expense to the trip.

“It’s harder to accommodate the one outlier,” she said. “If there are ten women and one man you have to get an extra room for that guy and figure out how to plan for gender in that sense.”

Senior Matthew Hill was part of the “British Images” travel-learning course last semester. There were three men and eight women on his trip. He said he agrees with Argiro that rooming is one of the biggest issues that arise with gender discrepancies like this.

“The only area where it really had an impact was rooming while we were on the trip,” he said. “While the women were able to change their roommates over the course of the trip, we men always had to room together.”

Hill said he didn’t mind the rooming situation because he got along well with the other men, but said he could see why that might be a concern.

Hill said he was interested in travel-learning courses because they allowed him to study abroad without devoting an entire semester to the experience. He also said this course related directly to his studies.

“It seemed like a natural decision,” he said.

Jill McKinney, associate director of the Center for Global Education at Butler University, said in an interview in 2008 that she found three main reasons that women studied abroad more than men: motherhood, age and safety.

She said she found that women who were planning to have children at some point in their lives sought opportunities for travel at a younger age than men. She also said that men tend to be more adventurous with traveling on their own, whereas women actively seek opportunities for organized group travel for increased safety.

This begs the question, do more men seek to use the more individualized TIPIT program to fulfill their study abroad desires?

The answer seems to be: only slightly. In the cycle last fall, ten of the sixteen TIPITs were awarded to women as primary proposers of the projects, that’s 62.5% female.

Durst said perhaps part of the reason for the gender discrepancy might be historical gender differentiation.

“I think a lot of the professors involved in travel-learning are coming out of departments that in-and-of-themselves tend to be dominated by female majors.”

Durst said he is not concerned women are missing out on these opportunities, but wants to reach out to the men.

“I have no loss of sleep about the women,” Durst said. “They travel, they’re involved, they participate. They get the notion of active-learning expanding beyond the classroom. They get it. My fear is, there’s an experience being missed, and a connection being missed by most of the males and that is sad.”

As representatives of his own social demographic, Durst said that white males don’t seem to be picking up the ball as much as they perhaps should. He said it has become a goal of his to figure out ways to make sure that group, in particular, can become more involved.

“One idea would be aggressive recruitment,” Durst said. “The other issue with the program might be design. Maybe I need to sit down with my course connection’s male students and ask, ‘What would interest you?'”

Although travel-learning courses are fairly evenly taught by male and female professors, the gender imbalance in students continues to be significant.

“Socially and statistically, it is a significant difference,” said Durst. “It’s not just a little bit, it’s a major difference of involvement. So I guess I’m throwing out a challenge to males to some degree.”

Minority students face prejudice, harassment

Reporter’s Note: It is the view of this journalist that those behind the incidents described are a vocal minority in the OWU and Delaware communities. Nevertheless, these incidents are relevant to the entire community and need to be acknowledged and addressed. This article contains quoted slurs used against minority communities.

Racism

As an African-American student walks down the street, a car slows next to him as a passenger rolls down the window; “nigger!” the passenger yells before the driver speeds off.

Several members of Ohio Wesleyan’s African-American community, male and female alike, report having been victims of this kind of racist drive-by harassment.

Senior James Huddleston, co-president of Black Men of the Future (BMF), said he was walking down a street with five or six other African-American students when “a car drives past, and they (the passengers) just (yelled), ‘damn niggers!””

“I wasn’t trying to judge OWU for that, but that makes me look at the world different since (then),” Huddleston said. “That kinda changes the way you feel about the area or the society (you’re in).”

Senior Nicole Lourette, a member of Sisters United (SU), said she knew of two former students, both African-American women, who had “nigger bitch!” shouted at them as they walked down Sandusky Street.

“People don’t walk up to you and do something, but they’ll do it in the way they can (get away with it),” she said.
Senior Andrew Dos Santos, BMF co-president, said these things have happened to him “four or five different times.”
“(As I cross the street) a car just drives by – and I know this happens to everyone in (BMF) – and the driver yells ‘Hey, nigger! Nigger!’ and they speed off…They’re in the safety of their car—I can’t really do anything, I can’t run to the car and knock on their window and say ‘Hey, you really shouldn’t call me that.’”

Dos Santos said he’s heard of many other instances of racial epithets being shouted at black students, but students aren’t the perpetrators.

Junior Lehlohonolo Mosola, resident adviser of the House of Black Culture (HBC), agreed—he said most of the insults he’s heard have come from Delaware residents.

“In defense of the school, I’ve experienced less racism from the school and from the people who go here than probably any other school or place that I’ve been in for a long period of time in my life,” Mosola said.

“Now, the town around Ohio Wesleyan, it’s pretty bad, I’m not going to lie. I’ve certainly had obscenities screamed out of cars at me more times than any other place in my entire life. It makes no sense, because I’ve been in supposedly stereotypically way more racist places than this. That’s kinda against Delaware, but the school – I’ve had much less trouble here than I have in the past.”

Senior Nginyu Ndimbie has had a different experience—he said another student called him a “nigger” at a Halloween costume party.

“I wanted to slash him with this styrofoam sword that I spent all day making, and I just looked at him, and I’m just like, ‘No, that’s not cool,’” he said.

“To a degree, I wanted to scare him. I wanted to take him somewhere and tell him, ‘You’re lucky that you’re saying this to me and I don’t really mind this word, but the fact that you find it funny is not okay.’

“I truthfully did not have it in me; it ruined the whole party, just the idea that this kid felt so insulated that that word is a joke to him, was really bizarre to me.”

Lee Yoakum, Delaware’s city coordinator for Community Affairs, said in an email that these incidents are “not representative” of the Delaware community, and that the Delaware Police Department has received no complaints about racial slurs being shouted at OWU students.

“(W)e want to know about (such incidents),” he said.

“Students should contact OWU Public Safety and/or the Delaware Police Department.”

Legally, Delaware City Prosecutor Mark Corroto said in an email, authorities must “balanc(e) between free speech and menacing (or threats).”

Section 2903.22 of the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) defines menacing as knowingly causing another “to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person’s unborn, or a member of the other person’s immediate family.”

An individual who violates this section would be guilty of a fourth-degree misdemeanor; according to Section 2929.24, this would be punishable by a jail term of “not more than thirty days.”

ORC Section 2927.12, concerning “Ethnic intimidation,” lists Section 2903.22 as one of several not to be violated “by reason of the race, color, religion, or national origin of another person or group of persons.”

A menacing conviction was also found to violate this section would become a third degree misdemeanor, punishable by “not more than sixty days” in jail, according to Sections 2927.12 and 2929.24.

Corroto mentioned an incident several years ago where a black man was called the N-word by a Delaware resident and “punched the caller in the mouth.”

Despite it being a clear assault, Corroto said the jury acquitted him.

“It was, I must admit, a loss that I did not bemoan,” he said.

Several members of BMF described hearing more subtle racially-charged statements, sometimes even from roommates.
“I don’t think people even realize they’re being racist, but it’s just subtle undertones, it’s frustrating,” said sophomore Garrison Davis, a member of BMF and resident of HBC.

“I feel like people aren’t as outward with their racism, but they find ways to do it,” Lourette said.

“One thing that is a problem on this campus is stereotypes—stereotypes that people think black people do or are,” said sophomore Mariah Powell, president of SU.

She described having to watch “Madea Goes to Jail” with several white students, who asked her if this was what all black women were like. She said without such movies and TV shows, they wouldn’t have that image of African-Americans.

“So they just have this view of all black people because they’ve seen ‘Real Housewives of Atlanta,’ or ‘Bad Girls Club,’ or something like that, so they think I act like that too, and I don’t,” she said.

“…Other people, if they don’t know you, they don’t really know how to take who you are, so they just put you all in one big bubble.”

Members of BMF also discussed how societal expectations affect their ability to react to the racial taunts they’ve suffered.

“I like to talk to people about it,” Dos Santos said. “Something happens, they say something and I’m like, ‘Why do you think it’s okay to say that?’ instead of getting upset, because as soon as I get upset, I fulfill the stereotype—I’m the angry black man, and anything I say is nothing, so I have to be calm and logical.”

Senior Andrew Wilson said black students are “forced to react” this way when confronting racist actions.

“If someone outright calls me a fag or a nigger to my face, I can’t get mad at them because if I do, I’m insinuating a stereotype, and then that builds and that validates that stereotype, and that validates that action again,” he said.

“That’s not fair, but that’s the social construct, that’s the world we live in… I can’t get mad because if I get mad I’m going to be that angry black guy… We can’t do anything but sit in these meetings and vent, every single damn meeting we have.

“And that’s the purpose of BMF, SU, and SUBA, VIVA, VSA, Horizons (International), Chinese Culture Club, Hillel—is to vent about all these injustices that are imparted on us, but we can’t get mad about them because it’s not socially acceptable for us to get mad. I don’t understand that, and we don’t have conversations about that in our classes at all, and we don’t have those conversations with the people that we would like to have them with.

“We all know that it’s not okay to do all this stuff, but for the people that aren’t in this room, that won’t come to this (BMF) meeting… that don’t even see any of us on this campus, that’s who we want to talk to. That’s who we want to reach… It’s cool to be politically correct and all that shit, but there comes a time, like Dr. Martin Luther King says, there comes a time when silence works totally against what you’re going for. Silence doesn’t do jack shit; it actually makes shit worse most days.”

Sexism

“Sexism is extremely prevalent on this campus,” said junior Jenna Culina, a resident of the Women’s House (WoHo).
“People don’t realize it … This is a terrible thing to talk about, it hurts, but sexual assault on our campus is something that is still happening—like the amount it has happened and when you come back to or you come to Take Back the Night, it hurts your heart, because you realize how many women and how many men it has happened to on this campus.”

“…Then it finally brings you down to earth and you realize, ‘Wow, sexism is all around me’…I personally have never dealt with sexism, but that doesn’t mean that I won’t deal with it later.”

Culina said many of her housemates have experienced sexism, especially in their job searches.

“My mother, actually, was denied a job because a man had the same qualifications but they didn’t think she had the physical strength that he (did),” she said.

Culina said her mother worked in a hospital’s emergency department and would regularly help move bodies from one gurney to another, while wearing “skirts and suits.”

“She has been (in the medical field) for 25 years, if she can’t lift a body off a gurney then she’s got some shit wrong,” she said. “It makes me so mad.”

Senior Lauren Dudley, a member of SU, said men often don’t take campus programming around “women’s issues” seriously.

“I know that we’ve had some instances where we’ve had programming about serious things, for example we’ve had a serious discussion here about rape, and there are film series or discussions or awareness events that people put on,” she said.

“I think for people who I hope just don’t really understand how serious that is, there’s a lot of inappropriate joking I think, and then sometimes you feel harassed when you’re putting out fliers and people are laughing about rape, and you just feel uncomfortable.”

Culina said during last year’s Take Back the Night march around the campus, an unidentified student in Welch Hall shouted “We’re coming to get you!” from a window.

She said yelling also took place during SlutWalk, a fall march that raises awareness of victim-blaming in regard to rape.

Culina also said the 1984 Take Back the Night event was marred when students firebombed WoHo. Due to this incident people, usually fraternity brothers, guard the house during Take Back the Night.

A May 17, 1984, article on the WoHo fire says two students came forward and pled guilty to first-degree misdemeanor charges of criminal damaging-endangering shortly afterward. They “voluntarily withdrew” from the university within two weeks of the incident.

The article, however, makes no mention of whether Take Back the Night was occuring “early Sunday morning” when the fire took place.

The first Take Back the Night at OWU was on a Wednesday night in 1980 following three reported assaults, according to an article in The Transcript.

The 1984 article does not mention how the fire was started or why a university official described it as “accidental” and a “joke that went awry.”

A letter to the editor published in the May 24, 1984 edition said the cause of the fire was “a smoke bomb” thrown into the house.

“Women’s reactions to the fire that destroyed the Women’s House are a mixture of praise for the university and students and disappointment at comments made by others,” the May 17 article reads.

It also includes quotes from resident Liz Phelps ’84, who said students were standing around making “rude comments” and jokes as the house burned.

The May 24 Letter to the Editor said these “rude comments” included male students standing around the burning building drinking beers and laughing, saying “the dyke house is burning down.”

“Even if you choose to ignore the basic anti-women issue involved here, you must at least acknowledge the lack of human compassion shown…(J)ust passing the charred remains of the Women’s House stands in mute testimony to the deep emotional devastation experienced by these women,” the letter reads.

On the recent spring break mission trips, one woman student who requested to remain anonymous said she was surprised to encounter subtle sexism.

“We were doing a lot of like heavy labor, like deconstructing houses, minor construction work, and I was surprised by some of the males on my mission team, who I considered like friends or pretty progressive,” she said.

“…They didn’t take me seriously, and there were times where the tools were taken out of my hand when I was doing a fine job by men who thought that they could do the job better, and I guess that really surprised me. …me and a few other girls got together after the end of the day and voiced our frustrations to each other.”

Homophobia

“In the past year there’s been one specific event on campus, towards the LGBT community, where a person of our community was attacked verbally and had beer bottles thrown at them,” said Culina, the president of PRIDE.

The incident occurred in October 2012 and was the subject of The Transcript’s Oct. 26 editorial “The opposite of ordinary: Striving for tolerance for all walks of life on campus.”

Senior Anthony Peddle said the perpetrator was one “uneducated member of a house on campus” who is not necessarily representative of their peers.

“It was not an organization or a set of persons with beliefs attacking another set of persons with beliefs, or actions, or identities,” he said.

Peddle, the president of PRIDE at the time of the incident, said the administration took action the next day, but how it handled the situation wasn’t clear to students.

“I think their reaction to this event was appropriate, and appropriate as a learning experience, for the student community as well as the administration, to better adapt to things like this,” he said.

Culina, however, said she had been unaware that the university took any action to address the incident.

“I understand how the university would not want to call attention to something that could be damaging, you know, but at the same time I think it would make a lot of us feel more safe if we had understood that (official action had been taken),” she said.

Aside from this incident, Culina said she doesn’t think homophobia is a problem in the OWU community. Peddle said he feels it is “a represented problem,” but might be “under-represented” in comparison to other similar colleges.
“What I mean by that is, no matter where you go, no matter where you are, you’re going to face some sort of discrimination and difference bias based on a plethora of things,” he said.

“I think as a whole OWU is very accepting,” said sophomore Hannah Sampson, PRIDE secretary.

Freshman Courtney Austin, a member of PRIDE, said OWU is “really way more accepting” than his high school. Austin, a member of the black community, said he comes from an area where the Ku Klux Klan is active.

“Coming here was like, ‘Oh, let me say these things, I don’t have to filter, well, most of what I say,’” he said. “That was just amazing in its own way.”

Culina said she only knew of two incidents of homophobia at OWU, including the October incident. She said the other involved a Facebook argument, which was told to her during a PRIDE meeting when she asked whether any members had been discriminated against because of their sexual orientation.

A member, whom Culina did not name, said she’d seen a post from a former friend of hers suggesting lesbians just hadn’t had sex with the right man yet. When she asked him politely to take the post down because it was offensive, he refused.

“I cannot look at them the same way,” Culina said about the individual who posted the offensive remark. “I will never – I have never spoke to this person again (since then), simply because it happened again, and this person’s ideologies never changed….Other than that, I’ve been extremely comfortable (at OWU).”

Peddle, though, described an incident that took place “a month (or) a month and a half ago.”

“I was walking to my house, from HamWill (Hamilton-Williams Campus Center), and I have a rainbow on my backpack, and a townie rolled down their window and screamed, ‘Hey faggot, watch out!’”

Austin mentioned a similar incident where he and other runners were practicing outside and “one guy (yells) ‘Faggot!’ and then drives off.”

“I just want to point out, though, that in the Delaware community, we have had a queer church, and we’ve had a gay-straight Christian alliance, that’s still going right now,” Culina said.

“…that’s momentous, for a city of this size and a city of this ideology.”

She and Peddle also said Delaware residents – including University President Rock Jones and his family – regularly take part in Columbus’s annual Pride Parade.

“There are extremely uneducated people in Delaware, and that’s what it is, but at the same time there’s that side where there’s a community of queer people – there’s a larger community of queer people in Delaware than people think,” Culina said.

Peddle said he thinks it should “take(n) into account” that OWU and Delaware residents participate in the Pride Parade as a Methodist college in a predominantly Christian community.

“These are pretty momentous things, and they may seem like nothing to pay $65 to march in three-mile long hot ass parade, but it means something, and I think that not many students see that because they’re not here in the summer,” he said.

“We only get the experience of August through May; we don’t get to experience the outside culture of Delaware, to understand, you know, we’re stuck in our sub-world.

“It’s a bubble, and I think we’re on the right way to pop it, but it’s going to be a hell of a long way.”

Documentary offers lesson about ‘invisible’ problem in military

Marine Lieutenant Elle Helmer observes the Vietnam War Memorial in “The Invisible War,” showing at OWU on April 3.
Marine Lieutenant Elle Helmer observes the Vietnam War Memorial in “The Invisible War,” showing at OWU on April 3.
By Garrison Davis
Transcript Correspondent

American culture holds soldiers in high esteem—we honor them with medals, parades, holidays and discounts. But the award winning documentary “The Invisible War” shows that not all soldiers are treated equally.

On April 3, “The Invisible War,” which depicts the increase in sexual assaults in the military and efforts by the government to ignore the problem, will be shown at OWU.

“Where I come from, and pretty much everywhere else in the world women are not treated very respectfully” said senior Iftekhar Showpnil, organizer of the event. “It really bothers me because I really love my mom and my sister. So I always think about what would happen if something like this happened to them.”

Senior Glenn Skiles said she thinks the film’s message is important because “it’s reflective of a greater societal problem.

“Charges of rape are often times portrayed as being an inconvenience to the perpetrator and not as a violation of a woman’s right to consent,” she said.

Since 2006, close to 95,000 service members have been sexually assaulted. Of those incidents, approximately 86 percent go unreported. Of those that are reported, less than five percent go to trial and only a third of those result in imprisonment.

“I feel like everyone knows someone in the military,” said junior Oore Ladipo. “The knowledge that this could affect people you know makes it personal, and the frequency of cases makes it a serious problem.”

When considering what can be done about the situation, Showpnil referenced steps his fraternity, Alpha Sigma Phi, took to educate its members.

“We organized an event for men of our fraternity on how to deal with sexual assault and what can we do as men to prevent it,” he said.

According to its website, Invisible No More, the film’s companion organization, aims “to raise awareness,” “effect cultural change” and “serve as a means of healing for survivors of military sexual assault” through the film.

Ladipo said he thinks the problem of military rape and sexual assault requires both legal and social justice.

“This situation can only be solved by legislation leading to the punishment of sex offenders within the army and a proper education,” he said. “…Part of that education lies in society’s attitude toward rape culture. This is something that I feel needs to be discussed.”

Members of Congress feel similarly and have begun to act on the problem.

In 2012 Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) and Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-MA), formed the Military Sexual Assault Caucus to combat sexual misconduct in the armed forces.

Turner and Tsongas authored the Defense STRONG Act, which expands the legal rights of those who claim to have been assaulted to include base transfer and confidentiality when seeking assistance.

Off-campus fraternities seek growth

By Haley Cooper
Transcript Correspondent

New members are always being sought for Alpha Phi Alpha and Phi Beta Sigma, historically black fraternities with act chapters off campus.

Currently, there are only two active members of Phi Beta Sigma on campus and no active members of Alpha Phi Alpha at Ohio Wesleyan. There is an Alpha Phi Alpha chapter at Franklin University.

Senior Andrew Dos Santos, president of Phi Beta Sigma at OWU, said being a small chapter is rewarding despite being “a lot of work.”

“Because we are a small chapter, we get to know different chapters from different campuses,” he said. “I know my brothers from Bowling Green, OSU—the list goes on and on.”

Dos Santos said he joined Phi Beta Sigma because he had a friend from the track and football teams who was a member.

“After going to an informational session they (Phi Beta Sigma) hold on campus, you write down your name saying you’re interested,” he said. “They will contact you, then you make extra steps for the organization.”

Dos Santos said these extra steps are research. He said he had to research the “Divine Nine” African-American founded fraternities and sororities in order to make sure it was the organization he wanted to join. The Divine Nine consist of Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity, Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority, Kappa Alpha Psi fraternity, Omega Psi Phi fraternity, Delta Sigma Theta sorority, Phi Beta Sigma fraternity, Zeta Phi Beta sorority, Sigma Gamma Rho sorority and Iota Phi Theta fraternity.

Dos Santos also said most people don’t express interest because they don’t have a house on campus.

“A lot of people also think it’s (Phi Beta Sigma) for minorities, and it’s not,” he said. “If you like what we stand for, and you’re not a minority, you will get more respect from stepping out of your comfort zone. We are always looking for men of character and service.”

Dos Santos said once someone has expressed interest in one of the Divine Nine, they are not supposed to talk about it with others until the Probate Show, which is an exposition show for all pledges.

Dos Santos said Phi Beta Sigma stands out from other fraternities because they are constitutionally bound to a Divine Nine sorority, Zeta Phi Beta, which is not currently established at OWU.

The members from Franklin University were not available for a comment about their fraternity, Alpha Phi Alpha.
In order to get into these institutions one must apply online and have an alumni sponsor them.

“An aspirant (a man seeking membership) may apply for membership into a College Chapter as an undergraduate student in good standing at a four year college or university,” the Alpha Phi Alpha website said.

“College aspirants can only join the Fraternity at a College or University where an active chapter is present.”
For OWU students, this would be Franklin University in Columbus. According to the Phi Beta Sigma website, they also have the same requirements for application.

OWU Class of 2017 grows as new students’ deadline approaches

By Caleb Dorfman
Transcript Correspondent

By May 1, 2,800 high school seniors will decide whether they want to become a part of the class of 2017 at Ohio Wesleyan.

According to Rebecca Eckstein, vice-president for enrollment, the school receives a little over 4,000 applications each year and accepts 2,800.

For the current freshman class, 55 percent are female and 45 percent are male, according to the OWU website.
Of new applicants accepted so far, Eckstein 54 percent are female and 46 percent are male.

According to the OWU website, 47 percent of the student body is from Ohio, and 22 percent of the student body are from outside the country.

Currently, there are students from 45 countries at OWU. According to Eckstein, that number has increased to 47 countries being represented on campus.

“All of this changes daily until May 1st, the deadline for accepting our offer of admission,” she said.
The OWU website said students from 41 different states make up the student body, as of August 2012.
Eckstein said the majority of students, from the incoming freshman class as well as the current student body, come from Ohio.

However, “…a large percentage also come from California, New England, Michigan and Maryland,” Eckstein said.
For the both the current freshman class, as well as the incoming freshman class, the average GPA has remained 3.5, Eckstein said.

According to the OWU website, the current freshman class’ SAT scores ranged from 1050 to 1240.

The average so far for the incoming class, said Eckstein, is 1175.

“Many of the accepted students’ intended majors are science related majors,” said Eckstein, “Although many students change their majors after coming to college.”

Other intended majors included English and Economics-related majors according to Eckstein.

“However, many students don’t have a clue what they want to major in before coming to college,” she said.
Freshman Vinay Pinjani, an international student from Karachi, Pakistan, said when he came to college, he thought he was going to only major in Economics.

“But after I took a psychology class, I decided I wanted to double-major in Economics and Psychology,” said Pinjani.

“I never thought I’d even be interested in psychology, but now I want to double major in it.”

According to sophomore Charles Irwin, another reason that students come to OWU is for sports.
“I chose (OWU) mainly because I wanted to be on the swim team,” Irwin said.

A reporter’s reflection on issues of prejudice, privilege and awareness

By Spenser Hickey
Assistant Copy Editor

This editorial contains references to slurs used against minority communities.

I had my first brush with the issue of on-campus racism last year, writing a story on a rally over the death of Florida teen Trayvon Martin, shot by self-appointed neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman, whose trial has yet to officially begin and has unsurprisingly slipped out of the public eye.

Interviewing members of the Student Union on Black Awareness, I brought up the question of racial profiling in their lives; they mentioned some instances back home and Chaplain Powers mentioned the issue of “shopping while Black” in downtown Delaware. I followed up on this with a story on Anti-Hate Week shortly after, but then summer rolled around, and when I came back I had forgotten that prejudice – either on the basis of race, sex, or sexual orientation – still existed here.

A few weeks ago, I signed up to cover events honoring Dr. Martin Luther King. I’m ashamed to say that I picked the story because I thought it would be a good addition to my writing portfolio when I applied for a job. While I was talking to some audience members from the Delaware community, Chaplain Powers told them I was “a true believer” in the movement for racial equality; I sheepishly said that I was just a reporter.

Looking back, I was unworthy of Chaplain’s praise. Sure, I believed in racial equality – most people do – but what had I done about it? Nothing, and that’s what counts. Maybe now, having focused my reporting on the issue of race and minority issues in general, I’ve earned the term.

Many members of the majority community go through their time here unaware that prejudice continues; I wouldn’t blame them for it that much. But as a journalist, it was my job to know, and to show it to the community through my writing.

As journalists, one of our core responsibilities is to “give (a) voice to the voiceless.” As a BMF member pointed out, the minority communities on our campus, through no fault of their own, lack a voice that can reach the rest of the community; all they can do is vent to each other about shared experiences. As the campus’s reporters, it’s supposed to be our job to record their stories of discrimination and harassment. It’s news of the most real and raw kind, a rarity on a college campus, and we – myself especially – missed it.

I’d like to think that my stories have demonstrated adequately what minority communities experience, but I know this isn’t the case – I’ve only been able to talk to a small fraction of the minority community here, namely members of activist groups such as SUBA, SU, BMF, VIVA, Hillel, Tauheed and PRIDE, and residents of the Women’s House and the House of Black Culture.

To anyone I have not interviewed but who has a story to tell, please contact me: my email is schickey@owu.edu.
Going back to the interviews I did following the Martin Luther King events, when Professor Twesigye described being welcomed to campus with a swastika and Chaplain Powers said the campus woke up to a burned cross in front of University Hall his first year, I was stunned.

As a straight white man, I’ve never known the fury or humiliation that being called a nigger, bitch or faggot provokes. The English language doesn’t even have comparable words to be used against our majority community – and if that doesn’t show privilege, what does? It’s not something I can come close to comprehending, a fact that helped preserve my objectivity but cheapened my ability to provide context to the story.

While the most overt acts I heard of came from non-students – at least recently – there is still an undercurrent of subtle prejudice and stereotyping that persists among our community, in the past noticed only when it bubbles over into violent or destructive incidents – a bombed house or a burned cross here, a fist fight there, and then ignored once more.

As a campus, we pride ourselves on our diversity, but how much time do we give to the concerns of minority students? Not enough, in my view.

We mention Branch Rickey, class of 1903, as one of our most treasured alums, while neglecting to mention that 1903 was also the first year a Black student graduated from the university.

We claim that his time here, particularly seeing a fellow ballplayer denied housing at the hotel he stayed at, inspired his integrating baseball. We forget that it wasn’t until two years after Jackie Robinson joined the Major Leagues that OWU ended segregated housing and allowed Black students to live in dorms rather than Selby Stadium or off-campus. We may be proud of Branch Rickey now, but I doubt he was very proud of us in 1947.

The recent hate incidents at Oberlin, which were only noticed after a man in Klan robes was spotted outside the Afrikan Heritage House there, showed what racism unacknowledged can boil over into. Before this came a month of racist, homophobic and anti-Semitic graffiti and throughout the year similar messages were posted on an anonymous online forum for Oberlin students.

But as I write this editorial, and review the story it accompanies, I question whether it will achieve any impact on increasing awareness of prejudice and hate on campus and in Delaware.

This semester, after hearing about the past instances of serious racial intimidation on campus, I’ve written nine stories and this editorial – almost 15,000 words of copy – on issues related, either directly or peripherally, to minority communities’ struggling for equal treatment. The response I’ve gotten from minority communities has been overwhelmingly positive.

But the response of the majority community has been disappointingly minimal. Yes, I am aware that The Transcript has a small readership, and that few read past the front page, but that’s where six of my nine stories have been (including a feature photo).

For once, I’ve had the opportunity and the obligation to go beyond reporting on events and tackle an actual social issue, and yet the majority of students seem to remain oblivious to it.

It’s frustrating, and it’s a frustration shared by many of the campus activists I’ve interviewed in my stories. In my meetings with them, they’ve all said similar things.

“Is racism a problem here?” I ask. “Yes,” they all reply, often as a group.

“Are students and staff aware about it?” I ask. “No,” they reply. “We can only vent to each other; every minority group faces the same issues.”

As a reporter, I must remain objective in my reporting – and this editorial, given its subject matter being the same as the article I wrote. Due to this, I am hesitant to take a position, as a journalist, on whether racism, sexism, or homophobia is wrong – although as an individual, I’d be more than happy to give my view.
I can, however, say that racism, sexism, and homophobia is present in Delaware and at OWU, and provide many incidents of these issues having occurred here.

That’s what I’ve done; that’s what I’ll continue to do.

I can also say that, in my experience, both in my life and in the stories I’ve heard from interviews, it is the majority who are involved in continuing issues such as racism, sexism, and homophobia.

We – the majority – are the problem, if you consider these issues problems.

We may not be shouting slurs from cars or, in the recent case of Oberlin, writing hate graffiti or donning Klan robes, but we can still be part of the issue without even realizing it.

Furthering prejudice can be done in subtle ways, ones I’ve seen and heard in the majority communities at OWU; using anti-minority slurs, even in conversations with only those in a majority community, is one such way.

Yes, I realize that both this editorial and the article I’ve written on pages 1 and 2 use such slurs, and that they are not censored, as was done previously in The Transcript this year.

While it was not my decision to run the slurs in full, I’d like to explain my rationale for sending the story in with them as they are.

These slurs are foul words with a foul history I can barely scratch the surface of understanding. They are as unsettling to look at as they are difficult to stomach writing. It would have been easier for me had I sent my stories in with them printed as “n*****.”

But these slurs were, for the most part, said to me in full, by members of the communities they target, as they were shouted out by those who used them.

Censoring them takes away their foulness, but also allows one to skip over the words without considering the subjugation and history attached.

For those still reading this, I encourage you to continue educating yourself on this ongoing though hidden issue.
Go to a meeting of BMF or SU, come to Take Back the Night this evening, or drop by a PRIDE meeting – I’ve been to all of these and can attest that they welcome everyone, especially members of the majority.

Or, failing that, just go to an event they hold, or research the issues online.

But do something.

Beyond the Equal Sign: Being a straight ally involves more than a profile picture

My Facebook news feed was a sea of red on Tuesday.

As the Supreme Court commenced oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the landmark case on marriage equality challenging the blatantly heterosexist Proposition 8 from California and the federal Defense of Marriage Act, many of my friends changed their profile pictures to a red equal sign, a special version of the Human Rights Campaign logo.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a basic display of allyship spread so quickly. All it took was a few clicks to say, “I favor universal civil rights regardless of sexuality.”

Some people call this “slacktivism” – uploading a picture or sharing a link as a substitute for substantive action against injustice. While there is much more that can and should be done, I can’t agree that these easy actions are akin to doing nothing. Showing even tacit support is better than remaining silent – which, as Andrew Wilson pointed out in the story on page one, is most often counterproductive.

Complacency, however, is different. It’s disgusting to make a red equal sign your profile picture and then act as if you’re the (straight) hero of the queer movement and everything will be wonderful for queer people as long as your virtual friends see you as that little logo.

Straight allyship goes beyond being a decent person and favoring equal rights for our fellow human beings. It doesn’t mean beginning a statement of alliance with “I’m straight, but…” It means listening to the voices of queer people and joining them in active work against the heterosexist power structures under which we live. It means embracing sexuality as something fluid, spiritual and beautiful, not as binary and dictated by stereotypes or mainstream narratives.

Being a straight ally means more than arguing heterosexists are just religious fanatics or that we don’t follow any of the other laws laid out in Leviticus. While those are often true statements (the latter is always true), the stance of straight allies should not be concessional – we should not simply ask people to put their heterosexism aside only on the marriage issue, but rather demand it be rejected in all social, legal and political arenas.
On top of all this, being a straight ally requires an allyship “beyond marriage,” to borrow a phrase from queer activist Nancy Polikoff. Marriage is only one civil right queer people have had to fight for over several decades. But straight people still enjoy an incredible amount of privilege under the heterosexist systems constructed by American law and law in general. Sexual orientation is not covered under equal opportunity legislation, so it’s still legal for a federal contractor to fire someone because they’re queer. Private housing and real estate firms discriminate against queer couples regularly for incredibly arbitrary reasons. Being queer often means automatic disqualification from most federal or local elections. Queer people are victims of numerous hate crimes across the country.

To create true justice out of a heterosexist culture as straight allies, we must change the heterosexist systems that comprise it from the inside out, with marriage equality as a starting point. As Polikoff proclaims, we have to take the rights out of the institution of marriage and put them into a legal system that values all family units, regardless of whether they’re composed of parents and children, siblings, extended relatives or friends. Any people who care enough about each other to live together and provide for each other in some respect should be able to file a joint tax return, visit each other in the hospital and have access to the 1,100-some other rights that come with marriage in our current law.

Additionally, we must simultaneously raise our voices for justice as privileged people and promote the voices of the queer activists who have been doing it much longer than us and have to live in a society that marginalizes them. Our place as straight people is as advocates and allies, not leaders. And qualifying our allyship by beginning, “I’m straight, but…” only perpetuates the problem, as my friend Matthew Jamison noted.
So go ahead – make that red equal sign your profile picture. Watch the Supreme Court for a decision on Hollingsworth v. Perry in June. But remember to engage in activism and allyship offline, too.

Noah Manskar
Editor-in-Chief

OWU Chamber Choir spends spring break singing and sightseeing in Italy

Emily Hostetler
Transcript Correpondent

Students learned a little bit about ancient choral music, and even more about themselves, on the Chamber Choir’s trip to Italy.

Ohio Wesleyan’s Chamber Choir, a select group of students from the Choral Arts Choir, spent spring break performing and sight-seeing in Venice, Sienna and Florence, Italy as a travel-learning course.

Sophomore Brianna Robinson said she could not believe she had the chance to go to Italy and was grateful for going on such a musical trip.

“We sang everywhere we had the chance to,” she said. “(We sang) in the churches and even in the St. Mark’s square at midnight.”

Sophomore Calla Loadman said she had always wanted to go to Italy, but had never been out of the country before.
“I’ve always enjoyed choir trips,” she said. “They are always the best ‘vacations’ I have been on.”

In between performances, the group also had chances to stop and experience Italian culture authentically.

“We went to several different churches, cathedrals and museums,” Robinson said. “We were able to learn a great deal about architectural and artistic history in Italy.”

Loadman said she was able to pick up interesting details of Italian history while on the trip.

“I learned random pieces of Italian history from specific cities,” she said. “Venice used to be ruled by a doge (chief magistrate) and I learned why people say ‘put their life in your hands’ from Siena.”

Loadman said the Chamber Choir also had the chance to visit specific places choral music was written for.

Some composers created musical pieces for churches that had double choir space – a choir on each side of the church – so the choirs could sing to each other during the performances.

“I expected to learn a lot more about why the music was written for what specific purpose it was written for, and I did learn that because we went to the places (it) was written for,” she said.

While the students became more knowledgeable about culture and history, Loadman said she also learned more about herself during the trip, especially because she has never traveled out of the country before.

“I learned to be more confident in myself while traveling and that I can be more adventurous and I can handle it better than I thought I could,” she said.

Robinson said the trip exceeded her expectations in the best way.

“On this trip I expected to learn a lot about music,” she said.

“I ended learning a lot about myself. I learned how to feel an indescribable connection to my roots, as the Italian people feel towards theirs. I have come back to OWU with a love for this community that grows every day.”

As the choir was traveling through Italy, the new Catholic Pope was being chosen in the Vatican City.

Loadman said one of her favorite parts of the trip was witnessing the white smoke emerging from the conclave.

“We sang at a Catholic monastery for one of their masses, and at the end when we were singing, the bells started going off and we didn’t know why,” she said.

“At the end, we asked the people why the bells were going off, and they said it was because the Pope had been decided.”

Among the various times of scheduled singing performances, Loadman said they also had some spontaneous performances.

“A group of us went to St. Mark’s square, that was flooded, and we started randomly singing in the middle of it and people started watching and videotaping us which was really cool and a good bonding experience,” she said.

Robinson said her favorite moment is one that she will remember for the rest of her life.

“My favorite part was in Sienna while we were singing ‘Ubi Caritas’ in a church,” she said.

“The priest starting singing with us. The sense of connection with someone who is so important to the religious community on the other side of the world was the best feeling I had the entire time. It brought me to tears.”

Loadman said the Chamber Choir plans on going on the trip again in a couple of years, but until then, they will be performing on campus several times this April, as well as performing with the Columbus Opera.