In 2010, when Ohio Wesleyan took over ownership of the fraternity houses on Williams Drive, it was decided that there needed to be an agreement between the Fraternities, their alumni, Residential Life (ResLife), campus foodservice provider Chartwells and groundskeeping and housekeeping provider Aramark on what each party would bring to the table to do the best for the university and the fraternity chapters. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed then, and it was decided it would be up for revision every three years. This year was the first year the MOU is to be revised. However, there has been some discourse between the administration and the fraternities, and frustrations have been high.
âItâs a common agreement on paper,â said Dana Behum, Assistant Director of Student Involvement for Fraternity and Sorority Life, about the MOU. âItâs not as binding as a contract, but it is an agreement from both partiesâŚIt is a partnership between the university and fraternities. And that includes a lot of folks.â
Behum was the âin-betweenâ person for the fraternities in their relations with the rest of the administration involved with the MOU. Wendy Piper, Director of Residential Life, said her department was involved in the original creation and in the revision.
âThere is a change in the required occupancy level,â she said. âThe 2010 MOU stated chapters had three years â until Spring 2013 â to reach 80 percent occupancy. The revised MOU states chapters must achieve 85 percent occupancy by spring 2015 and 90 percent occupancy by spring 2017. There is also a change for those chapters who elect to have the university operate their kitchens, which allows chapters more options. The revised MOU allows chapters to decide if they want all of their meals to be provided in the house, if they want a combination of in-house meals and on-campus food points, or if they want to close their kitchens and have members choose one of the existing on-campus meal plans.â
Should a fraternity chapter on campus who currently has a house is unable to meet the occupancy requirement by the deadlines set, they are at risk of losing their house to other housing options on campus who may be able to fill those houses. Behum said in that event, the fraternity can petition to stay in their houses because they are not guaranteed housing in that specific house the next year. As of spring 2013, two fraternity houses had to submit petitions to ResLife, and both have been permitted to continue living in their respective houses.
âThey say, âWe would like to petition to remain in our facilityâ and Residential Life comes back and says, âPlease share your plan to recruit more or how do you plan to correct this,ââ Behum said about the petition process. âSo they have a full calendar year to reach the occupancy levelâŚ.They have to have a plan on paper to achieve it in the next year.â
Behum said it was not the universityâs intent to remove the fraternities from their houses, because they would then have to fill them with random students. The goal, she said, was to keep the houses both filled and still in the hands of the fraternities.
Other sections of the MOU deal with how Buildings and Grounds responds to issues in the house and the renovations to be made to the house. It also outlines how the fraternity houses are cleaned.
âThe gentlemen on campus asked for a lot more detail regarding cleaning the houseâŚthey requested more detail and solidity in when B&G (Buildings and Grounds) would be responsible for repairs like a broken window or mold in the basement,â Behum said.
Behum said some fraternities were more concerned with the B&G section than others. For example, one of the fraternity houses had sewage leaking into their kitchenâwhich has been taken care ofâand needed other remodeling and adjustments in the past month. Other concerns include cracking foundations and more plumbing issues.
âThe common theme our men are unhappy with is the turnaround time with large projects which need to be fixed,â Behum said.
Fraternity reactions, according to Piper, varied depending on the chapter and on what section of the MOU they had questions about.
âThe occupancy level has surfaced as a concern; however, chapters that have historically demonstrated higher occupancy seem to have found this change less objectionable than those that have struggled with occupancy,â she said. âThey also seem to appreciate that occupancy will be calculated on a three year rolling average, which will allow chapters to recover from (a) âleanâ semester of membership. Chapters that continue to self-operate their kitchen seem overall pleased to continue to have that option.â
Behum said the hike in the house occupancy is part of a campus wide initiative to bring OWU to full capacity. Piper said it is a goal to use residential facilities on campus to the best of abilities.
âAs a residential campus, our goal is to make use of all residential facilities on campus, and for many years the fraternity houses had occupancies that were low,â Piper said. âUnder the 2010 MOU, the chapters were given three years to reach a level of occupancy equal to at least 80 percent, which we felt was a reasonable goal given that their combined average occupancy (in 2009-2010) was about 66 percent. The expectation under the revised MOU aims to bring the fraternities to an occupancy level comparable to other university residences, which has been between 93 to 96 percent over the past five or so years.â
Behum said because fraternities were not filling their houses, âthe document challenged them to put emphasis on recruitment.â
She said the fraternity chapters on campus as a whole met the 80 percent occupancy goal fairly quickly, and many of them exceeded it since the original MOU was signed.
The MOU revisions also deal with events such as the Delta Tau Delta fire that were not addressed in the original agreement.
ââŚSome of the actions that were taken as a result of the fire, which had not been explicitly stated in the 2010 MOU, were incorporated into the MOU to guide future actions,â Piper said. âFor example, after the fire, Residential Life relocated the residents and made a concerted effort to keep them located in close proximity to one another wherever possible so that we were not in effect dissolving their community. The MOU now states that in the event of a disaster or emergency that requires students to relocate, the university will work to provide a living arrangement where chapter members are grouped as reasonably as possible.â
Behum said in her experience, the MOU is more of an open dialogue between the university and the fraternities.
âAlthough it may not be a perfect agreement and my not reach everyoneâs needs, it is a living document that we revisit now every four years instead of threeâŚif men are upset (though) we can open the document againâŚitâs to regulate communications between the university and the fraternities.â
Behum also said there are disadvantages to the MOU in that it can be difficult for all sides to be heard and can be a difficult conversation to have.
âThere are fraternities who are having a difficult time getting a response for projects that need to be dealt with, and what better way than to talk about it frequently, get all the right people in the room and get things in motion,â she said. âWhile there may be disadvantages to different groupsâŚbut ultimately it is a positive.â
Some fraternity members at OWU are frustrated by what the MOU revisions. A member of one house involved in listing the revisions the chapters wanted said he felt their voices really werenât heard or really considered during the final decision. Even though many of the fraternities were not satisfied, they felt they had no choice to sign it, since refusal would give the university the right to remove them from their houses. The member requested not to be identified for fear of himself being singled out, either as an individual or a fraternity.
âThe first time the MOU was drafted and signed, the fraternities were very apprehensive about it, but they signed in good faith,â he said. âOn paper it sounded great: the school would take care of the houses and provide everything, cleaning servicesâŚHowever, over the past couple years it really hasnât been done to the best of the schoolâs ability.â
One example he gave of the school falling short on their promises was on the renovations and plans promised three years ago. He said despite the plans to do rather extensive renovations on all of the houses, in reality the renovations executed were small, inconsequential things compared to the major issues the houses had. Where a house was having large and costly foundational or plumbing issues, the university would instead tear out lofts, replace old locks in the building or paint and consider those renovations, rather than dealing with the larger issues in a timely manner.
He said in the case of the plumbing issue, which eventually caused a sewage line break in Alpha Sigma Phi, the school is only now being forced to deal with it since it is considered a hazardous living condition. Another house is facing similar problems with their plumbing.
âEach house has their own unique problems, and the school really hasnât done anything to fix them,â he said.
As to the occupancy level for each house, he said there were some tensions. The fraternities are concerned about the 90 percent occupancy because of how recruitment fluctuates.
âThere was no real compromise with that, and it is frustrating because this is supposed to be a negotiation between two parties, but weâre kind of being forced into a corner because if we hadnât signed by the deadline, the school had the right to take all our houses away, and that wasnât something we wanted to risk,â he explained.
He said the only real compromise was the three year average for the 90 percent occupancy, even though theyâre not quite sure how that will work in 2017.
The member said the decision to move the revisions from every three years to every four also puts the fraternities at a disadvantage. Behum said many of the fraternity men werenât apart or even on campus at the time of the MOUâs creation, and many of their complaints could come from the fact they see it as new information since they never had to deal with it before. Now, however, any student involved with any MOU revision will be unable to be involved in the one previous and the one after, making continuity in understanding what revisions should be requested very difficult for the houses.
âWe wanted to keep it at three, so the freshmen now would have an understanding of what we went through, so they would have something to base their arguments on later,â he said. âBut now, with the revision every four years, thatâs not really possible.â
Though alumni of the fraternities were involved through the Alumni Inter-Fraternal Council (IFC), the brother said undergraduate members didnât have enough time to fully understand the MOU.
âWe kind of knew about it â we had a draft, but we didnât have the opportunity to argue our case,â he said. âThe person we really were able to talk to was Dana (Behum).â
Fraternity members were only directed to speak with Behum, and were not given the opportunity to meet with those who had the power to discuss and make changes to the MOU.
âThey kind of just put on a play, saying we had a month to review it, and then never talked to us about it,â he said. âThen, a week before the deadline, they contacted us, saying, âDonât forget to sign it.ââ
The member said at that point the fraternity presidents got together, requested one more week to suggest revisions, and then went through the MOU line by line and listed the changes they wished to make. When they submitted the changes, they were not considered and the presidents were forced to sign because of the deadline.
âCollectively, all the fraternities didnât want to sign, including the alumni, but we were kind of forced to,â he said. âIt just comes back to the fact the school has the upper hand.â
The brother said the Alumni IFC met with the school about those changes and the alumni from his chapter said they tried to make the same suggestions on behalf of the students, but the university administration still did not make the changes to the MOU.
âStudents were allowed to go to the first two (MOU meetings), but then students were no longer allowed to go any more,â he said. âItâs kind of hard to argue things that affect every day life when you donât have the perspective of someone living in the house every day. The alumni know about the huge problems but they donât know about things like theyâre not cleaning our bathrooms or picking up the trash or not taking care of things that break. Things that happen every day.â
He said there was one person at the meetings representing all of the fraternities, but that since it was really only one perspective and one voice, it wasnât really heard in the decision making process.
The member said while the fraternity presidents were arguing against the changes made and attempting to have their voices heard, they all became rather close and âa united front against a single enemy.â
âMost of the fraternities donât like whatâs going on at all,â he said. âNo major negotiations were actually made. It was more of the school saying, âThis is whatâs going to happen.ââ
As to food plans, the brother said the university was trying to direct all the fraternities to use Chartwells. The fraternities were able to decide whether or not to keep their kitchens under a separate contract (three of them have outside contracts with companies who supply them with chefs) or use Chartwells. However, the MOU states that particular section can be revised every year, âmeaning weâll have to fight every year to keep our own kitchens.â
The brother also said he was unsure as to why the university would continue with an MOU not really agreed upon by the fraternities when a large portion of donated money from alumni come from former members of the fraternities on campus.
He said the Greek alumni money is divided a certain way â 80 percent to the houses and 20 percent to the university to use as they see fit. He said he felt that 20 percent shouldâve gone to preventative measures in the house, such as the sewage or foundational problems, before they became an immediate living hazard. However, he said, the university refused to release their financial records of that money in light of all the renovations that havenât been made.
âWhy would you piss us off when all the money youâre getting is from our alumni?â he said.
Someone wanted students to know about the ongoing faculty salary dispute at Ohio Wesleyan.
A small lime green flyer was posted, showing a run-down of faculty salaries in comparison to other colleges that are members of the Great Lakes College Association (GLCA). Â On the flyer, OWU ranked 10th out of thirteen.
The flier had no other writing or commentâsimply the figures there, in multiple locations on campus for students to see.
While the subject of faculty salaries floated in and out of studentsâ minds, the facts were very much up to speculation. Some people had heard, from their professors or otherwise, that salaries were lower than they would like it to be. Others had never thought twice about it. But these fliers, many of which were posted on the doors of student residences, started a new conversation.
As this conversation began, a larger one had been going on among the faculty, administrators and Board of Trustees for decades about whether this was a problem, and if so, how the university would fix it.
While the perspectives vary and the arguments vary even more, there is one thing everyone can agree onâthe issue is very real, and the faculty is demanding it be acknowledged.
Â
A Broken Commitment
Over 100 OWU faculty signed a letter sent to the Board of Trustees dated April 3 explaining their grievances with the newest agreement announced by University President Rock Jones at a faculty meeting in March.
The letter, which opened with a statement about how rare it is for faculty to directly communicate with the Board of Trustees in a form of opposition, immediately addressed the facultyâs long battle for âsalary correction.â
âFor nearly a decade, the faculty of Ohio Wesleyan have (sic) seen their salaries fall in comparison to our peer institutions,â the letter said. ââŚOn occasion, they have sunk to the embarrassing position of dead last. We have watched, even during the period of salary correction, a variety of other projects, improvements, and goals repeatedly jump to the head of the institutional agenda, each one deemed a higher priority than bringing faculty salaries in closer conformity with those of similar rank and experience at the institutions with which OWU so often compares itself.â
The letter went on to explain that each year that passes without bringing salaries to par with those at peer universities according to the median salaries for professors at each rank in the GLCA is income lost to patient, loyal faculty who âdeserve the dignity of being paid as the dedicated, accomplished, long-serving professionals we are.â
According to the faculty, their salaries continue to be inconsistent with OWUâs place as a nationally recognized institution, and putting other budget priorities ahead of them âneeds to end now.â
Professor of History Richard Spall is the chair of the University Governance Committee, which serves as the faculty arm for OWUâs âshared governanceâ policy. In this system, the faculty, administration and trustees all collaborate to make important decisions for the university.
Spall said he was brought onto the committee in 2008, shortly after it held the first meeting to resolve this problem. In January of 2009, the Board of Trustees presented their agreement to make increases in salaries.
âAt the time of the discussion, it was completely understood that the commitment was to raise Ohio Wesleyan salaries to the median of the GLCA by rank,â Spall said.
GLCA schools have three ranks of professorsâfull, associate and assistantâeach with a descending level of commitment and, by extension, salary. In order to increase salaries by rank, OWU would have to increase each level of salary to their respective medians.
Spall said the Board of Trustees promised this within five years. The following year, the first stage of this increase was implemented.
âThe year after that, because the university was in difficult financial straits, a pause was imposed. And so no further progress was made in the second year,â he said.
The faculty letter addresses this: â(W)e have made precious little progress in improving this situation, and we know everyone acknowledges this is simply untenable. The state of faculty salaries at each rank remains egregiously low and the cumulative effect of this chronic condition is a source of urgent faculty concern.â
According to the letter, four years into the adopted salary correction, full professors earned only 87% of the GLCA median; associate professors only 85% of the median; and associate professors only 89% of the median of their counterparts.
The ordinal rank of OWU faculty salaries for full, associate and assistant professors is only ninth, tenth and eleventh respectively, and the faculty believes it could very well sink to the bottom again.
Spall said much of this concern is coming from the fact that in 2012, the university recommitted itself to the goal of increasing faculty salaries in the 2012-2013 academic year.
âMost recently, the board has informed us, through the president, that they regard reaching the median in the GLCA as meaning not by rank, but across all ranks,â Spall said. âAnd, that is⌠that is a lower goal. Second, they have decided that even though we have been reassured that the pause year didnât stop the clock; it was just we didnât make progress that year. We have now been informed that they regard the pause year as having stopped the clock.â
Because of this, the faculty, in general, would receive a salary raise across all ranks so that the gross income of OWU professors would meet the GLCA median. This means less money. Paired with the pause year, it means less money over a longer period of time.
The faculty letter responded to and commented on this development.
ââŚIt is clear that what faculty have unmistakably understood to have been promised is not what is currently contemplated,â it said. âWe cannot disguise the fact that what is presently planned with regard to faculty salaries is not acceptable. It is inconsistent with what has been routinely promised is the goalâŚwith statements that say the faculty are valued. It is unworthy of a great institution and of those who are entrusted with its mission, integrity, and reputation.â
According to Spall, in every discussion the University Governance Committee has had with the Board of Trustees or the administration, the committee has always defined the negotiations as by rank, or asked to double-check. On either occasion, the trustees have confirmed it and not challenged it until now.
In response to this development, the committee called a meeting of all teaching faculty, to answer questions and concerns about the Boardâs and administrationâs new plan to increase faculty salaries to the GLCA median across ranks. While the committee called the meeting, Spall said instigating and organizing faculty protests is not on its agenda.
âIf individual faculty members want to take action, thatâs up to them,â he said. ââŚOn the other hand, we did tell the administration that we wouldnât be putting out fires for them either.â
Dale Brugh, professor of chemistry, said he felt the committeeâs main purpose in this situation is to be a liaison between the faculty and the trustees. Based on its recent reports, he said itâs been questionable how big a role faculty play in governing the university.
âI think the point of contention is whether or not thereâs a real cooperation between administration and the faculty,â he said. âThereâs supposed to beâthereâs supposed to be this system of shared governance where we know whatâs going on, the administration knows whatâs going on and both sides contribute equally to the running of the institution. And I think part of the issue now is that perhaps there isnât shared governance.â
Spall said the faculty is united in terms of not taking action that would harm OWU students. However, he said faculty morale is the lowest he has seen it in his 29 years with the university because of the trusteesâ inconsistency.
Brugh said he is âdisappointedâ with the most recent developments in the debate because he thought there was a clear agreement between the faculty, the administration and the Board.
âWe thought we had an agreement that started three years ago, and I think everyone trusted the administration that they would follow through on their commitment,â he said. âAnd, you know, you get a promise from somebody and you just say, âOkay, theyâve promised me something,â and over time it becomes maybe evident that theyâre not going to deliver, and so when you fully make the realization that theyâre not going to deliver, thatâs when it looks like itâs all boiled up.â
However, the issue does not seem to be a simple matter of financial infeasibility.
âThey arenât making the argument from the point of we canât afford it,â Spall said. âTheyâre making the argument from, âThatâs not what they agreed to.â And yet this was articulated on so many occasions publicly, including (by) the president at faculty meetings, and now theyâre asserting that it was never understood that way.â
The letter brings up an additional problem: a reallocation of funds that should have been added to the faculty salary pool.
âIt recently came to our attention that funds for the faculty salary pool that, at most institutions, are the core of monies to keep institutional compensation on par have routinely been removed from the compensation budgets for other purposes,â the letter said. âLast year alone, the presumed salary correction amounted to a commitment of only $100,000 of ânewâ money for the purpose, which is why our average salaries increased only 0.7%. The loss of appreciated faculty salary pool funds over a period of years is in large measure how we came to this troubling position, for the decline correlates closely to the siphoning off of these funds for other purposes.â
Spall said this is a concern for the faculty.
âWe do know that some time in recent years, four or five years ago, someone in the administration began diverting funds that would typically recirculate (sic) into the salary pool for other purposes,â he said.
He said over time, each faculty member gets small raises, which oftentimes put their salary significantly over the standard for their position. When a professor changes schools, retires or dies, that extra money is put back into the faculty salary pool and distributed amongst the remaining faculty. Over the past few years, this money has not found its way back to the pool, and has instead been redistributed to unknown areas.
The perceived miscommunication and lack of transparency within the administration and board of trustees has frustrated the faculty, which they made clear in their letter to the trustees. This dishonored agreement, paired with what the faculty considers to be an unorthodox reallocation of funds, are what make their case.
Understanding the Data
In the past two years, Ohio Wesleyan faculty salaries have been ranked in the bottom third among the twelve Great Lakes College Association (GLCA) that reported data to the American Association of University Professors (Antioch College did not report). Faculty in every rankâfull professor, associate professor and assistant professorâmake less than 90 percent of the median GLCA salary for each.
In 2012, OWUâs average full professor salary of $81,800 was ninth of 12 in the GLCA. The average associate professor made $61,000, 10th in the GLCA; and the average assistant professor made $53,300, 11th in the GLCA.
Full professors made 88.8 percent of the GLCA median; associate professors made 84.7 percent of the median; and assistant professors made 89.7 percent of the median. The difference between the median full professorâs salary and the OWUâs average full professor salary was $11,700; for associate professors, $12,050; and for assistant professors, $6,100.
The salary for the average Ohio Wesleyan professor across ranks in 2012, according to university data, is $67,695. OWU ranked 10th of 12 in the GLCA that year, and that average professor made 90.8 percent of the GLCA median across ranks.
The difference between OWUâs average salary and the median was $6,856. This indicates it would cost far less money to bring salaries to the median across ranks than on a by-rank basis.
In 2011, Ohio Wesleyanâs GLCA rankings for average full and assistant professor salaries were the sameâ9th and 11th, with salaries of $80,000 and $52,500, respectivelyâbut OWUâs average salary for associate professors was last in the GLCA at $58,300.
Full professors made 96 percent of the GLCA median; associate professors made 83.8 percent of the median; and assistant professors made 88.2 percent of the median. The difference between the median full professorâs salary and OWUâs average full professor salary was $3,050; for associate professors, $11,250; and for assistant professors, $7,000.
Across ranks, the average OWU professor made $67,228 in 2011. That salary is 91.8 percent of the across-ranks median, and $6,033 less than the median.
Full professors made $1,800 more in 2012 than 2011, an increase of 2.25 percent. Associate professors saw an average correction of $2,700, or 4.63 percent. Assistant professorsâ salaries increased an average of $800, or 1.52 percent.
Across ranks, the average OWU professor made $1,767 more in 2012 than 2011, an increase of 2.78 percent.
Unlike those for faculty, salaries for three main administratorsâthe president, vice-president for Finance and Administration and Treasurer, and provostâhave been near or above the GLCA median recently.
According to data from the 990 forms universities file with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from 2010âthe most recent year for which data is publicly availableâOhio Wesleyanâs president, Rock Jones, made $267,406, eighth of 12 in the GLCA in 2010. His salary was 97 percent of and $8,296 less than the median.
Comparing equivalent officers at GLCA schools, OWUâs Eric Algoe, vice-president for Finance and Administration and treasurer in 2010, made $165,696 that year, fifth in the GLCA. His salary was 107.4% of and $11,396 more than the median. Jim Galbally replaced Algoe on an interim basis in the fall of 2012. Dan Hitchell took his place in January of this year.
Looking at GLCA provosts, David Robbins, OWUâs provost in 2010, made $186,353 that year. His salary was the highest in the GLCA for his position, 114.6 percent of and $23,775 more than the median. Charles Stinemetz replaced Robbins as interim provost in the fall of 2012; Stinemetz was officially given the provost position this past February.
According to Michael Long, chair of OWUâs Board of Trustees, these three examples may be outliers. He said the Boardâs analysis shows âthat on the whole, the officers are just below median collectively in salary.â He also said some faculty are âwell aboveâ their rankâs median, as some administrators are.
Â
A Deep History
The debate over faculty salaries is a longstanding issue at Ohio Wesleyan, and it has a complex historical context.
According to David Robbins, professor of psychology and former provost, the current dispute has its roots in a sequence of events starting in the mid-1970s. Shortly after Robbinsâs arrival to the faculty in 1973, he said, a âslight downturnâ in full-time student enrollment forced the university to hire fewer faculty than it had in the previous decade. The student body was replenished in the late 1970s with a flux of students from private schools on the eastern side of the country. According to Robbins, they were relatively smart with moderate SAT scores, but had âmotivation problems.â
âClasswork was not their first priority,â he said. âThey may have been more interested in sports, or more interested in fraternities or partying.â
Frustrated, the faculty told then-Dean of Admissions Fred Weed to stop admitting those students and to tell schools to advertise OWU to their brighter students. Not wanting their students to be rejected altogether, the schools directed the sub-par students elsewhere, but didnât send more talented ones to OWU in their place, causing enrollment to drop drastically.
According to Office of Admissions data, OWU had 2,351 full-time students in 1979. By 1983 it fell to 1,646, and reached its low point in 1985 at 1,387.
Robbins said the situation created a âbudgetary crisis.â To cut costs the administration, led by former University President Tom Wenzlau, cut several academic departmentsâincluding Community Studies, Speech and Social Welfareâresulting in the termination of 12 tenured professors, which Robbins said was âquite traumatic in our environment.â A tenure freeze was also instituted, so all new faculty were on hired on a temporary, term-by-term basis.
Two cost-saving salary programs were also launched. One was an early retirement severance package, where professors stopped working before age 65, the usual retirement age, for one or two yearsâ pay. This cost money up front, but Robbins said it was a long-run savings because it further shrunk the faculty.
Another program was three-year unpaid leave, targeted at younger faculty who might have wanted to âtry different thingsâ in other fields, according to Robbins, without giving up their job at OWU. Robbins said both programs still exist today âwith some modification.â
Additionally, the Board of Trustees furnished what Robbins termed a ârisk investmentâ of around $6 million to âoffsetâ budget deficit the low enrollment created.
Robbins said the ârocky roadâ enrollment has traveled has had lasting effects on the universityâs financial stability.
â(W)hen 70 percent or more of the operating budget is based upon tuition, room and board, that creates problems with building a budget year after year,â he said.
Because the budget is so variable annually, itâs become difficult to rectify the faculty salary problem since salaries are commitments made over several years.
When the enrollment crisis was somewhat assuaged, David Warren replaced Wenzlau as university president in March of 1984. Robbins said Warren was a âdynamicâ president who brought attention to OWU from the beginning of his termâthe presidentâs house wasnât yet available when he started, so he moved into the dorms with students, which was covered on national television.
According to Robbins, Warren was the âarchitectâ of the universityâs honors program, which was the inception of merit-based financial aid at OWU. He said its goal was to âimprove the profile of the class, bring more students to campus and recover at least a little net revenue from room and board and whatever tuition they may be paying.â It also hoped to attract students who might not qualify for merit scholarships, but would still contribute to improving the university.
âThe theory was, also, that that student from Galipolis or wherever who was extremely capable that got a no-need scholarship might also bring a friend, who might still be a good student, but not quite eligible for the honors program,â he said.
The plan was successful. By 1989, five years after Warrenâs inauguration, full-time enrollment was 1,904; in 1990, five years after the low point, the university had 1,992 full-time students. But financing the honors program and its merit scholarships came at a cost to the universityâs endowment.
According to Robbins, there are two primary subsets of OWUâs endowment. One is the permanent endowment, money the university invests in various places. Only the interest this money earns can be spent; the initial investment, known as the principle, cannot be touched. According to OWUâs 2010 990 form filed with the IRS, the universityâs total endowment that year was $186,632,438. Of that, 64.438 percent, approximately $120,262,210, was permanent endowment.
A second category is quasi-endowment, money given by donors to the general endowment fund not specified as a contribution to the permanent endowment. This means the university can spend the principle as well as the interest. 5.411 percent, or $10,098,681, was designated as quasi-endowment in 2010. The initial funding for the honors program came from the quasi-endowment in the mid-1980s.
A third type is term endowment, funds that must be spent within a designated time period. In 2010 30.151 percent of the endowment fund, about $56,271,546, was term endowment.
Robbins said the university projects a 15-percent return from the endowment each year, five percent of which goes into the operating budget. That payout rate is maintained even when investments donât yield 15 percent, leaving less money to add back to the endowment and adjust for inflation.
âThat hurts, because youâre cutting into that stability, that growth,â Robbins said. âBut we werenât taking out principleâthatâs the important thing.â
Because the first merit scholarship money came out of quasi-endowment principle, the program shrunk the overall size of the endowment, which caused it to yield less interest. This gave the university less money from the endowment to use for the operating budget and, in turn, the faculty salary pool.
Robbins said Ohio Wesleyan commissioned a team in 1986 to develop a plan for raising faculty salaries to fourth in the GLCA. It contained two faculty, himself and Joanne Harvey from the economics department; two administrators, Provost Bill Benz and Bob Holmes, vice-president for University Relations; and two trustees, current emeritus trustee Phil Meek and former trustee Bob Mecum.
The solution they found was to raise salaries annually by the GLCA average plus three percent. Robbins said two factors made this strategy a difficult one to maintain.
For one, the GLCA average is a âmoving target.â Each school tries to keep its salaries as high as possible relative to its peers, and each adjusts its salaries on an annual basis to stay away from the bottom of the list.
âSo youâre always trying to play a little bit of catch-up on the basis of if the other schools are trying to compete against you of not wanting to be beneath you in terms of average faculty salaries,â Robbins said.
Second, when professors retire or die, theyâre usually at the top of the salary list and get replaced by someone at an entry-level salary, which Robbins said makes the average look lower than it actually is.
Robbins said there was also a debate then over whether to evaluate salaries alone or total compensation, which equals monetary salary plus fringe benefits. The sextet settled on a salary-based solution, which Robbins said he advocated for because benefits are more variable and harder to measure between schools.
â(I)tâs a little better today, itâs more standardized today, than it was back in the â80s, but some institutions might include costs that other institutions would not,â he said.
The goal, though, was never achieved. Many more have been set, but none of them have been met, eitherâother things, like facility improvements (dorms, athletic facilities and the JAYwalk, for example), get in the way, and the Board of Trustees is reluctant to give additional funds from the endowment because of how much it has shrunk.
âEach president has come in and made a promise to increase salaries, and we try,â Robbins said. âBut the bottom line has always been that the Board, in their fiduciary responsibilities, want to see a balanced budget, and from their fiduciary responsibilities, do not want to get in a situation like we were in back in the â80s, i.e. using principle out of the endowment.â
According to Robbins, more money for the salary pool could potentially come from increased revenue as a result of a decline in the number of students receiving need-based aid, a reduction in merit scholarships or an increase in the size of the student body.
Another source is the annual fund, money given by alumni to the schoolâs general operating budget rather than to a specific department or cause. In recent years the annual fund has grown and been used to offset reduced payouts from the endowment in balancing the budget.
The Administration Responds
At the April 15 faculty meeting, University President Rock Jones presented a plan to raise faculty salaries to the GLCA median across ranks in three years. In his presentation, he acknowledged some financial obstacles Ohio Wesleyan has faced in recent years.
The universityâs net tuition revenue is about $2 million less now than it was in the 2008-2009 fiscal year, when University Governance Committee chair Richard Spall said the salary initiative was first discussed. Additionally, data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education System (IPEDS) indicates net revenue per student is $12,548 lower than the GLCA median without OWU included.
Jones said the budget model he and the administration have prepared will add to the faculty salary pool from budget reserves. It will also âbuild a baseâ for further growth by bringing in large freshman classes, since tuition is the universityâs largest source of revenueâover 70 percent, according to former provost and current professor of psychology David Robbins. Jones said the pause in salary increases was a result of a revenue decrease brought by a small freshman class.
According to Michael Long, chair of OWUâs Board of Trustees, the faculty salary pool will increase $600,000 over the next fiscal year, with the total compensation pool increasing $720,000. Jones said the salary pool will grow $1.6 million over three years; additions to the benefit pool make the total expansion over $2 million.
With that increase, Long said the difference between OWUâs average faculty salary across ranks and the GLCA across-ranks median will decrease from $6,625 to $3,559, moving the university from 10th to ninth among its peers.
With the GLCA median salary across ranks increasing at a projected two percent, the budget model will raise OWUâs average across-ranks salary to the median by the end of the 2015-2016 fiscal year. Average total compensation, measuring fringe benefits plus across-ranks salary, would hit the median in the next fiscal year and extend about $5,000 past the projected median in 2016.
Long said the budget model hasnât been voted on, but the Boardâs Finance Committee âexpressed appreciation for the model’s intention to move faculty salaries to the median, while also asking questions about OWU benefits in relation to other GLCA institutions.â
The trusteesâ written response, dated April 13, to the facultyâs open letter to the Board said salaries are their ânumber one priority,â which Jones said hasnât been the case in the recent past. He said thereâs historically been a larger gap in faculty pay between OWU and its peers than for administrators and staff, so the issue will require more attention.
Jones said he thinks the salary issue is an âessentialâ one.
âThe faculty has the responsibility for developing the curriculum and delivering the education that is why we are here, and they should be compensated fairly and equitably,â he said.
According to Jones, the additions to the salary and benefit pools will âtake a toll on other aspects of the universityââthey donât allow for any increases to program or department budgets and will result in smaller raises for non-faculty.
While the faculty feel the administration and the Board of Trustees committed to raising salaries to the GLCA median on a by-rank basis, the Board resolution from January of 2010 did not specify whether the initiative would move forward by rank or across rank. Long said the Board is still considering which standard is best.
âThis issue remains to be addressed, and the facultyâs open letter to trustees has caused us to seek more information about this distinction and its impact,â he said.
According to Long, no Board records indicate which framework would be used, either. Jones said the Board was âless clear in its understandingâ than the faculty and has continued to evaluate which model to use.
The Boardâs letter to the faculty said the trustees have also considered comparing Ohio Wesleyanâs total compensationâsalary plus fringe benefits like healthcare, tuition remission and othersâto its GLCA peers instead of salary alone. If this were the case, OWU would fare well. According to IPEDS data, OWUâs fringe benefits as a percentage of salary is highest in the GLCA at 40.6 percent. The universityâs standalone benefits package ranks third at $27,502. If salaries were at the median by rank, OWUâs total compensation across ranks would be third-highest in the GLCA at $106,760.
While the budget model uses the across-ranks standard, Jones said it was âcertainlyâŚnot communicated clearlyâ to the faculty that that framework would be used.
Robbins said the original goal set by the administration and Board was different than the budget model Jones presented in April, and that he acknowledged the dissonance between the facultyâs understanding and the Boardâs.
âI think the president is on record as saying that his goalâwe may be mincing words here between a goal and a commitmentâbut his goal, and we talked before about the difficulty in reaching goals, his goal was to do rank-by-rank,â he said. âBut as he indicated in the last faculty meeting, the Boardâs resolution talked about increasing faculty salaries without reference to rank-by-rank. So there is that perceived difference.â
Long said the university doesnât have the financial resources to raise salaries to the GLCA median by rank. According to Dale Swartzentruber, associate dean for institutional research, two factors complicate using the by-rank system.
One is the fact that OWU has the highest proportion of full professorsâ45 percentâof any GLCA school. Swartzentruber said this happens because associate professors are eligible for promotion to full professor after five years in that rank, two years less than at most of the universityâs peers.
âBecause we have so many, it costs us a lot of money to try to hit the goal of paying the fulls comparably to the fulls at the other schools, (be)cause we have so many of them,â he said.
Another factor Swartzentruber said makes the by-rank framework more difficult is OWUâs ânon-overlappingâ salary policy. This dictates that the highest-paid associate professor canât have a higher income than the lowest-paid associate professor, and the highest-paid associate professor canât make more than the lowest-paid full professor.
According to Swartzentruber, a few professors hit the âceilingâ salary in their rank and start to get smaller raises than if they were in the next highest rank. He said the Faculty Personnel Committee, which handles faculty promotions, sometimes favors promotion if a candidate is at the ceiling.
âWe donât typically have very many people who are hitting that ceiling of the associates, so in some sense itâs kind of a moot point,â he said. âThey can continue to make more money as associates, but occasionally we do have people that are at the top of the rank and are being deprived of raises that they would otherwise get. Thatâs the perspective that they have, is that theyâre being deprived of the raises that they otherwise would have earned.â
Swartzentruber said the non-overlapping salary structure is uncommon. Robbins said he thinks OWU keeps the policy because itâs âequitableâ for faculty.â
âWhen I stand up in front of my class and lecture about the role of the amygdala or the role of the hippocampus in influencing behavior, I want to be considered just as important asâŚ(when in) the economics department, a faculty member stands up there and talks about economic trends, and when an education or and English faculty member stands up and talks about them, I should be valued in the same way,â he said. âWhat better way of doing that than paying us the same amount?â
In its letter, the Board thanked the faculty for âbringing to (its) attention that funds released when senior faculty retire have not been routinely returned to the faculty salary pool.â It said neither the Board members nor Jones knew the additional salary money was leaving the pool, and agreed that the practice should be reinstated.
According to Swartzentruber, itâs ânot entirely clearâ why the practice was stopped, but caused salary pool growth to slow in recent years. When raises were given to faculty, the additional money resulting from the difference between retiring facultyâs pay and their replacementsâ was supposed to supplement the amount of money budgeted for faculty salaries.
â(I)t wasnât necessarily a mistake that was made, but I think that the growth in the average salary at Ohio Wesleyan wasnât as large as people thought it should be given how much additional money was (supposedly) being put back into the pool,â he said.
Because the money wasnât being ârecycl(ed),â Swartzentruber said, there werenât as large additions to the pool as there should have been. Jones said this is called salary compression.
âSalary compression is more likely to happen in faculty ranksâthis is not just here, itâs also at other places; thatâs why you have to be very careful not to let it happenâwhen people are here for a long time,â he said. âWhen administrators are replaced or even hourly people, you have to pay the market to hire the person.â
According to Swartzentruber, these surplus salary monies werenât specifically being taken out of the salary pool for use in another particular section of the budget. He said he thinks the money should have stayed in the pool, but that he doesnât think it was stopped intentionally or that its discontinuation was the result of âincompetence.â
âI think what we were doing was not the proper thing, but it wasnât maliciousâit wasnât that someone was saying, âAh, now we can take that money and use it for that,â or, âI hope a whole bunch of people retire, cause then weâll have even more money to spend on this or that,ââ he said. ââŚI think there was just a lack of understanding of the implications of our process.â
Jones said he is âperplexedâ as to why itâs taken so long to rectify the salary situation at Ohio Wesleyan. He said salaries lost a lot of ground between 2004 and 2009, but he doesnât know exactly what happened because he wasnât inaugurated until 2008.
He said the recession that began that year has played a big role in reducing the resources OWU has been able to dedicate to salaries. 2008âs freshman class had $1.6 million in government aid that doesnât exist today, which the university has had to make up for in scholarships.
âI think the model that weâve developed is a first step,â he said. âBut weâll never be absent of the circumstances of the broader world, and if we had another significant recession and suddenly had significantly less money, there are many things that we want to do today that would be difficult to do tomorrow. So I think we need to all understand that weâre doing everything we can, but we are not immune from external forces.â
The Board also took note of the external factors than can affect the universityâs finances.
âWe must also remember that a good budget process does not eliminate the potential for a negative financial outcome in the event of low enrollment, economic recession, or similar adverse event,â it wrote in its letter.
Robbins said he thinks the issue of by rank versus across ranks has only become contentious recently because the faculty and administration were just âpleasedâ the Board said anything on the matter. He said most trustees come from a âdifferent environmentâ than others associated with the university.
â(T)hese are, a lot of them, business people,â he said. âThey come from an environment where long-term commitments like this are not made to their employees and where salaries are individually negotiated, sometimes benefits are individually negotiated.â
Jones said some of the goals the university has set in the past, like the 1986 salary enhancementâs ambition of getting salaries to fourth in the GLCA, were âunrealisticâ because they werenât financially sustainable.
âI would love to pay our faculty at that level, but the resources are not available,â he said.
Looking Ahead
To Jones, the faculty salary issue is a âcomplexâ one that âhas a lot of emotion charged behind it.â He said he thinks it will take âdisciplineâ to make sure the administrationâs plan gets carried out.
While he acknowledged the one-year delay in increases, Long said the Board of Trustees âhas not renegedâ on its 2010 resolution to get salaries up to the GLCA median. The Boardâs letter to the faculty contained a âwarm welcomeâ for the two parties to continue to discuss their âshared goals for OWU.â
â(T)he Board has remained committed to raising faculty salaries, and has allocated as much funding as possible to this goal, while continuing its obligation to consider other pressing needs as well, including compensation for non-faculty, resources for departmental and program budgets, and care for the facilities,â Long said.
According to Swartzentruber, Ohio Wesleyan isnât alone in dealing with this problem. He said faculty here play a more significant role in governing the university than at other schools, which he appreciatesâhe started as a psychology professor in 1992 and moved into a full-time administrative role three years ago.
âSome schools, the faculty really just have to go along with whatever the administration thinks is best,â he said. âAnd the faculty here donât tolerate that, and I think thatâs appropriate. I like working hereâŚ. And although everyone would like to make more money than they currently make, the difference between what we make as faculty here and what weâd like to make is not, like, double.â
Chemistry professor Dale Brugh said the issueâs roots in the universityâs history have exacerbated the problemâseveral faculty have been at OWU for between 30 and 40 years, and are especially upset now because theyâve âdedicate(d) their livesâ to the institution. He said some of his peers wonât be satisfied unless the administration and the Board fulfill their commitment to the by-rank framework; others have talked of unionizing. Most want a âclear sense of opennessâ from the Board and administration, to âfeel like (they are) a part of the process.â
âAs a scientist, for me itâs important that people look at the same dataâthat the more people you have looking at the same information, the more likely you are to notice problems with it and to discover errors and to then make good decisions, to correct mistakes before they actually are made,â he said.
Robbins said heâs in favor of a by-rank solution. But he said he thinks the non-overlapping salary policy is good for the university, despite the confounding effect it may have on using a by-rank standard for increasing salaries. Unlike OWU, Robbins said, schools like Ohio State will pay an incoming economics professor more than the most senior education professor, which he doesnât think is fair.
âThatâs not who we are,â he said. âThatâs not the kind of values system that weâre trying to place upon our students.â
Swartzentruber said heâs not sure the issue will ever be completely resolved.
âI think itâs human nature to expect that youâd like to make more, or to expect that youâre going to get a bigger raise than you actually got,â he said. âI donât want to undermine the faculty concern, cause itâs a serious concern and we do, in fact, have an underpaid faculty here. Itâs just a matter of, relatively speaking, how much underpaid are they?â
A man was shot Thursday night on the Woodward Elementary School playground at 200 S. Washington St., three blocks from the Ohio Wesleyan campus.
Delaware Police Department (DPD) officers responded to a 911 call at 8:15 p.m. reporting a fight outside the school, according to DPD Captain Adam Moore. When they arrived, they were informed the fight had resulted in a shooting.
Joshua Mosley, Jr. of Columbus was arrested and charged with felonious assault after police conducted an investigation at the scene, detaining and interviewing seven witnesses.
Moore said Mosley âmade some statementsâ indicating he committed the shooting. Some witnessesâ testimony also contributed to the probable cause for the arrest.
The victim, Darryl Ginyard of Delaware, sustained a gunshot wound to his upper body and was airlifted to an Ohio State University hospital. Moore said he was told the man went into surgery for his injuries last night.
According to Moore, in the coming days DPD will continue to collect evidence and determine any other involved parties, as well as figure out the motive for the crime. He said officers are âstill pursuing the location of the weapon.â
âWe know kind of what happened now; the next question is, âWhy did it happen?â or âWhat was behind it?ââ Moore said.
Moore said the incident bears no relationship to Woodward Elementary School other than its location. He said itâs questionable whether the parties were trespassing because many local schools offer their playgrounds for public use.
âObviously they were not using the playground for its intended purpose by getting into a fight or shooting firearms, but I really canât comment on what the schoolâs policy is about who can use their equipment and when they can or cannot use it,â he said.
Around 9:30 p.m. a Public Safety (PS) alert was sent to OWU warning of a shooting on Liberty Street with the suspect still at large. The alert told students to stay inside.
Director of PS Robert Wood said PS was ânot able to confirm immediately who the shooter wasâ with DPD.
The Babbling Bishops, OWUâs improvisational comedy troupe, were performing their final show of the year in Chappelear Drama Center. During the show, a member of the theater staff took a member of the troupe aside. After the show ended, the troupe informed the audience that âsomething had happened on Liberty Street.â
By then, many had already seen the first PS alert and a later one from around 10:20, saying police were still searching for suspects and that no students or OWU employees were involved in the shooting.
âStay inside with doors and windows locked,â the alert said.
Shortly after the Babblers informed the audience the campus was on lockdown and the building was in âcrashâ position, Officer Jay McCann and Investigator Art Reitz of PS arrived to escort students from Chappelear to the residential halls.
“We’re going to move you in a couple of large groups,â McCann told the audience. ââŚIt’s still an active situation, we are still asking you to stay inside (and keep) doors locked.â
After learning that almost everyone in the audience were going to Bashford, Thomson or Welch Halls, or Small Living Units on Rowland Avenue, McCann announced that they would move as one group, with one PS officer in front and another at the rear.
âPlease stay close together, we’re going to go as quickly as possible,â he said. “And again, let me reiterateâuntil an (all clear) alert comes out, please stay inside. I know this is the last day of classes, I know this is Blackout Thursday…this is very unexpected, and it is a very dangerous thing …the police department is still advising us to stay inside.â
He told the audience he didnât want to see a student encounter the alleged shooter and be shot.
âYou know me well enough, I wouldn’t be telling you this if it wasn’t the truth, I need you to really follow this, okay? Get in your dorms and stay there.â
The audience filed out into Rowland Avenue. Many walked in silence; some had their arms around each other or held hands. They reached the residence halls without incident.
Shortly after midnight, another alert went out, updating that the investigation â now listed at Woodward Elementary, when previous alerts said it was on Liberty Street or off-campus â was ongoing, but that âthe scene is quiet.â
âBE CAUTIOUS if out in area,â the alert concluded.
Director of University Communications Cole Hatcher sent a campus-wide email at 12:38 p.m. Friday saying no OWU students or employees were involved in the incident. The message encouraged students, faculty and staff to contact DPD with any relevant information and to sign up for the OWU Alert system that kept the campus informed as details unfolded.
âWe hope to provide as much information as we can as quickly as we can, and we hope we succeeded this time,â Hatcher said.
UPDATE: As of 3:42 p.m. on May 3, DPDt issued an arrest warrant for Chante N. Durr on a felonious assault charge. Durr is also suspected in the May 2 shooting incident. According to the DPD press release, anyone with information on Durr’s whereabouts should contact police at (740) 203-1111 or file an electronic report at crimereports.com. DPD is also seeking information about the location of the gun used in the shooting.
UPDATE, May 7, 8:33 a.m.:Â According to DPD Captain Adam Moore, the warrant for Durr’s arrest was issued because investigation indicated she had been involved in the confrontation leading up to the shooting and had made some threats during the incident.
According to sophomore Kristen Puckett, Day on the JAY is not just a tradition, but an event not to be missed.
Puckett, president of Campus Programming Board (CPB), said Day on the JAY, held this past Monday, is received very well compared to other events planned by CPB.
âItâs hard to get the word out no matter how fun your event is, because there are just so many events on campus all the time,â she said. âBut Day on the JAY advertises itself.â
Puckett also said this yearâs event had âall the great stuffâ from past years, as well as a performance by Pitch Black, Ohio Wesleyanâs womenâs a cappella group.
Performing at Day on the JAY is the groupâs prize for winning the âOWUâs Got Talentâ competition in March.
In order to âspice it up,â CPB chose ârock nâ rollâ as the theme for this yearâs Day on the JAY, according to Puckett.
She said CPB decided the theme before the semester started.
âItâs the same for all of our eventsâsomeone comes up with a theme or idea and everybody just really likes it, so we go with it,â she said.
âThe theme really helps us plan and narrow down fun things to have.â
In keeping with the theme, CPB commissioned an Elvis impersonator to perform on the JAYwalk for the event.
Freshman Jessica Gooden said she feels Day on the Jay is different from other campus events.
âSince it is spread out along the JAY(walk), I feel like more people take part in it and itâs just a fun time to hang out with friends and take a break from classes,â she said.
Sophomore Calvin Cagney agreedâhe said the event is âreally easyâ to attend.
âYou can always stop by for a bit after class since itâs in the middle of the day,â he said.
Freshman Emma Keller said the food is an âawesomeâ part of Day on the JAY, but she also enjoys the other activities available.
âMy favorite part would have to be the unique things we (students) get to do, like getting henna or playing in a bouncy house,â she said.
Keller also said she would like to see Day on the JAY occur more frequently.
âItâs an amazing event that seems to unite our campus, and itâs sad that it only happens at the beginning and end of the year,â she said.
Gooden said she thinks CPB should create âDays on the JAY,â where the event would last for more than one day.
âI could do with some more great fun in my life,â she said.
Rape and sexual assault are the most under-reported crimes nationallyâ54 percent of rapes are never reported to authorities, according to the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network (RAINN).
In Delaware, most that are reported are quickly closed. According to a list of all Delaware Police Department (DPD) reports of sex crimes (including dissemination and display of harmful material, rape, sexual imposition, gross sexual imposition, pandering of obscenities, sexual battery, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor and use of nudity-oriented material with a minor) between Jan. 1, 2008, and March 1, 2013, 45.1 percent of sex crime cases have been exceptionally cleared, meaning no arrest was made even though the suspect was known; 20.3 percent remain inactive pending further information. 8.8 percent were declared unfounded accusations, meaning there wasnât sufficient evidence to support the case.
In that same time period, Ohio Wesleyanâs Department of Public Safety received 22 sex crime reports, but only six were ever reported to DPD. Of those six, four were exceptionally cleared and two remain pending or inactive. One 2008 incident was said by PS to be reported to the police, but no corresponding DPD report exists. PS Lieutenant Cathy Hursey said DPD declared the case unfounded.
PS Director Robert Wood said the department is legally obligated to file a police report for any felony sex crime reported to the university, regardless of whether the victim files a report individually. Some, like rape, according to DPD Captain Adam Moore, are automatic felonies; but others, like sexual imposition, have misdemeanor and felony levels.
Even when itâs âiffyâ as to whether a crime reported to PS is a felony, Wood said the university would rather report to the police than notâonce a crime reaches the felony level, there is more at stake than the victimâs decision whether to report it themselves.
â(Y)ouâre really breaking the laws of the state, and what the state says and what the prosecutor says,â he said. âIf youâve got a rampant sex offender out there committing felonies, even if you donât want to prosecute it, we have a responsibilityâwe might have a responsibility to prosecute it because of the other people involvedâtheyâre a danger to the community.â
In non-felony cases, however, PS procedure leaves it up to the survivor whether to report to the police. Wood said the department would informally notify DPD of the incident, but it is still up to the victim whether to file a formal police report.
In addition to filing a police report, PS is required to release a weekly log of every crime on campus under the federal Clery Act. According to the logs from 2008 to 2012, there was one sex crime in 2009 reported to both PS and DPD, but it is not accounted for on the annual report of aggregate Clery data from that year. Wood said the incident might have fallen out of the Clery sex offense categorization when PS compiled the aggregate data.
According to Wood, it is in Public Safetyâs interest to report any âreportableâ incident, but in dealing with sex crimes, the survivorâs dignity is a priority.
â(S)omething I think we all try to do is give the power back to the victim,â he said. âIn other words, we let them know that weâre not going to make you do anything that you donât want to do, weâre going to be honest with you, weâre going to tell you whatâs going to happen, but you tell us how we can help you. Youâre in charge here. Weâre youâre advocates.â
According to Detective Sergeant John Radabaugh, DPDâs policy is similarly deferent to the survivor. They can elect to initiate a âfull-court pressâ investigation by gathering witnesses and collecting evidence, or do nothing at all, in which case the incident becomes exceptionally cleared. Sometimes survivors will choose to leave a case inactive in case they change their mind; an inactive rape investigation can be reopened any time within the 20-year statute of limitations.
When a case is left pending, Moore said, the publicly available incident report will only contain a âmedia report,â a brief, basic explanation of what happened and what the status is. Most other details remain inaccessible to the public.
Moore said DPDâs procedure for sex crime cases is founded on the want not to âre-victimize victims.â
â(S)exual assaults, a lot of times those crimes are about control and power, and I think once a personâs been a victim of one of those crimes and had the loss of control or power, we as a police department do not want to force them to do something that they wouldnât want to otherwise do,âŚbecause in a sense, weâre taking away that victimâs power and weâre taking control, which is exactly what led them to being a victim,â he said.
According to Radabaugh, this sensitivity is the departmentâs attempt to assuage the incredible difficulties of reporting and prosecuting sex crimes. The criminal justice system, in tandem with a culture in which being a survivor of sexual assault or rape is shameful, sets up an immense amount of hoops survivors have to jump through to be successful in procuring justice for themselves.
âLook at it this wayâ(when) somebody is sexually assaulted, it is probably the worst thing that has happened to them up to that point,â he said. âSo they have the initial traumatic event, they get the courage up to come in and talk to me, who they had never met before, about the worst thing thatâs ever happened to themâwhich is likely the second worst thing thatâs ever happened to them. And then I ask them to go to the hospital for an exam to collect a certain amount of evidence, at which point they go in, remove some of if not all of their clothing, are asked about the event another time by the nurse, and then I sit down and talk to them about what moving forward in the criminal justice system means. And it almost invariably means talking to several members of a grand jury with a prosecutor and stenographer in the room, and once an indictment is made, possibly going to trial in front of the person who attacked them, the defense attorney, the judge, the person who attacked themâs support system, and 12 members of a jury. And that has got to be a very daunting prospect to anybody. So moving forward is not an easy thing for a sexual assault victim.â
According to John Durst, assistant professor of sociology and anthropology at OWU, the criminal justice system often places a larger burden on survivors to prove they were indeed assaulted. Because the locus of legal procedure in sexual assault and rape cases is consent, which can be subjective, a survivor pursuing a conviction has to go through a âgreater sort of questioningâ to prove what happened to them was technically illegal.
Senior Paige Ruppel, moderator of the Womenâs House, said she feels alleged perpetrators often attempt âto prove that the survivor is guilty somehowâ by asking irrelevant questions, like what they were wearing.
âThat sort of rhetoric, I think, doesnât come in as much into other crimes,â she said. âAnd maybe I just notice it more with these sort of situations, but I just really think that thereâs something thatâs not lining up.â
Socially, Durst said, American society engages in a false balancing act of the necessity of convictions and the harm of false accusations in rape and sexual assault cases. This ignores the fact that a minute minority of cases nationally are false accusations, and tips the scales against the survivor even more.
â(B)alancing that might be a little misleadingâthere may be two percent of all cases that are wrongly convicted, and 50 to 60 percent of cases that never even comes to the eyes of the criminal justice system,â he said. âBut all that has to play itself out in a court system thatâs framed in a sometimes difficult way to get a conviction.â
In Delaware, DPD cooperates with other resources for survivors to create a collaborative approach to justice and recovery. Organizations like HelpLine of Delaware and Morrow Counties, Grady Hospitalâs team of sexual assault response nurses, the Sexual Assault Response Network of Central Ohio, victim advocates and others work with criminal justice personnel to make reporting, investigation and prosecution an easier process.
In Woodâs 35 years in law enforcement, he said, heâs never worked with a department more adept at handling sexual assault than DPD.
âTheyâre good at a lot of things, but Sergeant Radabaugh and I have worked together a long time, and I have complete confidence in this department with the way our students and our populations are treated,â he said.
Despite this, Moore said OWU students have mixed ideas about what the department does and what the best course of action is to take when deciding whether to report sexual assault. Messages from the media and peers, he said, can be âreally, really powerfulâ in shaping someoneâs perception of the police and âhow interactions with the police are going to go.â
â(T)here are so many opinions out there and thereâs so much in the media about what we do and how we do it, that a lot of times people have preconceived notions about whatâs going to happen if they report to the police a crime or what have youâŚ,â he said. âI think we canât discount the power that happens, tooâthat they may or may not have accurate information as to whatâs going to happen if they come forward.â
Wood said he feels reporting sex crimes most often does more good than harm for students.
âIâve been here just about seven years, and Iâve never had a victim or survivor come back to me and say, âGod, reporting to the police was the stupidest thing I ever did,ââ he said. âNot one time.â
In addition to the public criminal justice system, students can also pursue sex crime sanctions through the intra-university Student Conduct system.
Michael Esler, coordinator of Student Conduct, said he receives an average of five sex crime reports each academic year; about three of them pursue charges fully, while the other two decide not to proceed. Reports can come from essentially anyone on campusâPS, Residential Life (ResLife), students who know the survivor or the survivor him- or herself.
One option a complainant has in the Student Conduct system is an informal resolution, a scheduled confrontation between the survivor and the perpetrator mediated by Esler. Few cases, Esler said, take the informal routeâitâs usually reserved for situations when the survivor and perpetrator are close and want to continue their relationship.
The more common action is a formal hearing before the universityâs Sexual Misconduct Hearing Panel, a group of faculty and staff who hear every sex crime case during the year they serve. As mandated by a 2011 âDear Colleagueâ letter from the federal Department of Education, sex crime cases are decided using the âpreponderance of evidenceâ standard, which is less stringent than the previous âbeyond a reasonable doubtâ standard, also used in criminal courts.
If a complainant is hesitant to proceed with filing formal university charges, Esler said he will sometimes ask to meet with the perpetrator and report back to the complainant following the meeting. If the perpetrator reacts unfavorably, it will sometimes convince the accusing student to move forward.
Regardless of what the complainant does, Esler said, the university is obligated by the âDear Colleagueâ letter to take some sort of action. The rule is fairly âopen-ended,â but something must be done to âtry to correct the problem, create a better climate on campus,â or otherwise alleviate the damage done.
Overall, it is the responsibility of the Student Conduct system to balance the âthree-legged stool,â in Eslerâs terms, of sex crime casesâthe university must âbalance the dignity of the person bringing the accusation,â âprotect the rights of the accusedâ and âprotect the interest of the overall community.â
âItâs not conducive to a successful academic career if youâre always looking over your shoulder worrying about being attacked, or whether your friends are safe,â Esler said. âThatâs a huge concern for us, and so whenever Iâm dealing with these cases, Iâm always trying to keep in mind that there are three interests here that need to be balanced and protected; and thereâs no formula for it, but you have to consider all three of them all the time. Thatâs the challenge.â
Ruppel said she feels the university system is much friendlier to survivors than the criminal justice system, in which survivorsâ âagency is violated all over again.â Additionally, the abundance of resources and the support of ResLife and PS make it easier for survivors to successfully utilize their Student Conduct options.
ââŚI think that there definitely is a level of respect and privacy and anonymity thatâs insured through the campus system thatâs talked about very openly, and I really think that that helps people feel more comfortable coming forward,â she said.
Durst said he thinks the nature of university as an institution gives it better awareness of how intimidating sex crimes are to report. OWU in particular, he said, has a good number of administrative and academic programs, like the Womenâs and Gender Studies department, that focus rather intensely on the issue. However, he said, the administration has itself to look out for in dealing with the problem, since colleges and universities have only paid much attention to the problem of sexual assault on their campuses in the last 10 years.
â(T)he university might have its own interests in mind to make sure that it does investigateâas I said, shouldâbut that it does investigate and has a lower standard, in a sense that the university doesnât want to be portrayed as a place where sexual assault goes unnoted,â he said.
Ruppel said the intimacy of a campus environment can be daunting for survivors, especially those whose perpetrators are people they know. The weight of being responsible for a friendâs suspension or expulsion can weigh heavy when deciding whether to pursue a sanction.
ââŚI feel like survivors are often put in the position where they have to choose between reporting and potentially losing a friend group or losing a community that they have built on campus, or not reporting and staying silent,â she said.
Ruppel noted that there have been many more reports of sex crimes recently than in the pastâPS reports say the department received 15 reports between 2011 and 2012, about twice as many as the three prior years combined. To Ruppel, this reflects the fact that sexual assault and rape are still serious problems at OWU, but also shows the campus has become more âconducive to reporting.â
Esler said he is less sure whether universities are inherently better environments for dealing with sex crimes since they âreflect the general society,â but policy changes like the âDear Colleagueâ letter to create better environments for survivors by providing âmore guidanceâ and âstricter requirements.â
According to Wood, one facet of the criminal justice system that makes prosecuting sex crimes so difficult is its foundational principle of proving guilt rather than innocence. In American law, itâs more favorable to let a guilty person go than convict an innocent one. Combined with the cultural stigma attached to sex crime, this makes it even more difficult to secure a conviction.
âBased on that type of system, it does add challenge to the prosecution and conviction of sexual assault and people that commit that crime, and thatâs just part of our judicial system that we think is important, I guess, in terms of the way that itâs structured,â he said.
Reform, though, is on the horizon. According to Esler, some portions of the âDear Colleagueâ letter making it easier to prosecute sex crimes made it into the newest version of the federal Violence Against Women Act; other reforms like rape shield laws and rules prohibiting the admission of a survivorâs sexual history as evidence.
Despite this, though, Esler said the reliance on âcircumstantial (inferential) evidenceâ sex crime prosecution often necessitates and the cultural shame around being a survivor still make the legal system incredibly difficult to navigate.
â(T)here are reforms out there, but thereâs still a stigma, and I think people reporting it will sometimes shy away from it because the system can be harsh on themâŚ,â he said. âA strong defense attorney will try to turn the tables and somehow make the person filing the complaint the guilty party.â
Additionally, according to Esler, most sex crime laws are enacted on a state-by-state basis because they are out of the federal legislatureâs jurisdiction.
The lack of federal power has resulted in an inconsistent âpatchwork federal systemââsome state laws are easier on victims, while others make it more difficult to get a conviction. Therefore, itâs left to administrative agencies like the Department of Education to use their fiscal âleverageâ where they can to make policy friendlier.
Durst said he thinks the reason behind the discrepancies between university and legal systems is procedural as well as structuralâit takes a lot of political effort to change criminal statutes, so itâs rarely done.
â(I)tâs a very politicalâgood and badâprocess to do anything in terms of creating, modifying, doing anything in terms of the actual criminal code and the processes,â he said.
Regardless of administrative or legal reforms, Durst said. American culture and law are still patriarchalâmen make the laws and dictate how they will be enforced. Because law is a reflection of societal values, Esler said, it will take a deeper cultural change to make the legal process easier for survivors.
â(A)s long as people donât take rape and other sexual assault as seriously as they should, as long as men believe that this is something that isnât that serious, weâre not gonna be able to make huge reforms,â he said. âSo ultimately I think it has to be a societal thing, where people respect the dignity and privacy and integrity of other people, and unfortunately too often that isnât the case.â
According to Radabaugh, American culture has a lot of myths about what sexual assault isâthat youâll only get raped if youâre in a bad part of town at the wrong time, and that itâll be a surprise. These contradict the reality that a perpetrator is more likely to be someone the survivor knows. This avoidance of reality is why itâs so easy to believe those myths.
â(T)he myth is a lot more comfortableâthat is one of the things that makes it so difficult to change, because the reality is uncomfortable,â he said.
âSo itâs going to require, at kind of a very deep level, a change in the way that society understands what sexual assault is, and that is gonna take a lot more than just law enforcement, or just victim advocates, or just sexual assault nurse examiners, or just prosecutors. Thatâs going to take a lot of workâŚ.(O)n one hand that can be very frustrating for me, because Iâm inside this working every day; on the other hand, I can see how it is comfortable to believe those myths.â
While awareness has undoubtedly increased, Durst said, the legal and cultural systems in place are âtediously slowâ in making changes suited to that awareness. There are resources in place, but their limited reach and the patriarchal nature of the culture make it âa long ways off from being equitable or just.â
âWhat weâve done is baby steps in the right direction, butâŚthe larger state and federal court structured systems are still eons behind in terms of addressing that sort of thing,â Durst said.
To Ruppel, the problem is as relevant on the individual level as the systemic levelâthe amount of âirrelevantâ questioning survivors have to endure in the court of public opinion is just as onerous as it is in the criminal justice system.
â(S)mall things like that that are just ingrained because of the rape culture we live inâthat needs to change,â she said.
On April 16, concert pianist and professor of music Robert Nims accompanied his wife, mezzo-soprano professor of music Marilyn Nims, in a four-part faculty recital in Jemison Auditorium. Marilyn Nims sang 23 short songs in the Nimsâs production of âMannersâŚThe Way We Are,â celebrating her upcoming retirement at the end of the year.
During her 29 years at Ohio Wesleyan, Marilyn Nims said she has performed in 29 faculty performances.
âIt is an opportunity for faculty members to model what they are teaching,â she said. âWhile performing, the faculty artist is illustrating those concepts in technique, musicianship, musicality, and communication which have been discussed in applied lessons. Faculty recitals also add to the cultural life on campus and in the community.â
According to the department of music website, Nims has âbeen an opera or oratorio soloist with many orchestras and choral groups including the Columbus, Mansfield, Central Ohio, Welsh Hills and Columbus Youth Symphony Orchestras, as well as Cantari Singers of Columbus and the Columbus Bach Ensemble.â
The website also said Nims has performed with the Robert Shaw Festival Singers in Souillac, France, and at Carnegie Hall in New York City.
She has also sung chamber music with the Marble Cliff Chamber Players, OWUâs Duvall Ensemble, Mid-America Chamber Music Institute and the sextet Vocal Colour.
Robert Nims retired from teaching in 2002. He was a professor of voice and Director of Choral Activities at Ohio Wesleyan.
Since retiring Robert Nims has been an adjunct voice teacher at Ohio State University and an interim teacher of voice at Capital University and Cleveland Institute of Music.
He is also an adjunct professor at both Ohio Wesleyan and Otterbein Univeristy.
Robert Nims played piano for each piece, starting with a German song called âFischerweise,â or âFishermanâs Song,â by Franz Schubert.
âItâs very easy working with my husband, since we know each otherâs musicianship and musicality so well,â Marilyn Nims said of working with Robert.
âItâs also a pleasure working with faculty colleagues, who bring their own background to the mix. Our work with students usually involves some element of instruction, which is a different situation than working with a colleague.â
Many of the songs Nims sung were in German, while others were in French, English and Spanish.
âBeing able to translate and pronounce foreign languages is essential for âclassically trainedâ singers,â Nims said. âThe study of German, French and Italian is always a part of our preparation. Spanish is of late becoming an essential, and many schools now offer training in Russian and Czech.â
The audience was able to follow along in the program, which had the lyrics translated into English.
Between each piece, Marilyn Nims briefly gave facts about the songs the audience couldnât find in the program, as well as exchange short banter with her husband.
She has a particular interest in the Spanish zarzuela, which is a form of musical theater. She has âserved as (a) singer and Spanish diction coach for the zarzuela theatre at Jarvis Conservatory in Napa, California, and has made singing translations of two zarzuelas,â said the music departmentâs website.
Marilyn Nims used theater throughout the performance. Each song had a different movement or form of animation involved.
âSingers are most often presenting words as well as music, and since we face the audience directly, acting becomes an important factor for interpreting those words,â she said. âSome pieces seem to beg for physical communication; others seem best letting the music and words speak for themselves.â
One of the more animated pieces was a German song by Hugo Wolf called âElfenlied,â or âElf Song.â Nims used her body language and vocal fluctuations to perform as a mischievous German elf.
Another at the end of the second section of the performance was Jake Heggieâs âOnce Upon a Universe.â Nims again used movement to act as a young version of the Christian God being scolded by his mother for breaking his toys, a pun on the universe and Godâs creations.
Marilyn Nimsâs last song out of the 23 she performed was Leonard and Felicia Bernsteinâs âI Am Easily Assimilated,â a testament to her long, successful career making music as well as teaching it.
By Hugh Kerins
and Jimmy Sanzone
Transcript Correspondents
The Battling Bishops menâs lacrosse team has started the season strong with an 11-5 record, and looks to continue to improve going into North Coast Athletic Conference (NCAC) tournament play. Through April 20 the Bishops had only lost five games, one to conference rival Denison University. The team lost 8-11 in a close battle against Denison on April 17 at Selby Stadium. At that time the team was battling with Denison for the outright first place position in the conference.
Denison has now won 11 of the past 12 match ups against OWU dating back to 2005.
âThey were a good team,â senior attacker Colin Short said. âAnd they were really good at being patient while they had possession of the ball and at waiting for their openings to strike.â
The Big Red took a 2-0 lead in the first quarter with goals from attackers Teddy Powell and Nick Caravana. At the 2:01 mark, the Bishops were forced to call a timeout after being shut out the previous 13 minutes of the quarter.
âWe really didnât take the time we needed to set up our offense to attack the net,â said freshman defender Mike Knapp after failing to score in the first quarter.
The Battling Bishops immediately responded in the opening minutes of the second quarter with senior midfielder Pat Bassett scoring the first goal of the game for his team, making the score 2-1.
Stagnant play followed Bassettâs goal as both teams failed to score for the next ten minutes of action. Ohio Wesleyan sophomore Ryan McMahon made a few crucial saves in the opening minutes, keeping his team in the game.
OWU forced Denison to call a timeout with 4:33 remaining in the first half after the Bishops stole possession from Big Red midfielder Christian Miranda and Powell.
The Big Red immediately responded, scoring three times in the next three minutes to pull ahead 5-1 over the Bishops with 1:55 to go in the half. The first half ended with the Bishops trailing Denison 5-2.
Knapp was determined to win at halftime.
âWe didnât care about the score,â he said. âWe knew we needed to play great lacrosse the next half to win the game.â
OWU came within one goal on two separate occasions in the third quarter, trailing both 6-5 and 7-6 in that time.
Denison battled back, with attacker Eddie Vita scoring off a Powell assist with 1:13 remaining in the quarter, giving the Big Red an 8-6 lead heading into the final 15 minutes of action.
After turnovers from both teams to begin the fourth quarter, Denison midfielders Tyler King and Chapin Speidel scored two consecutive goals in a span of 21 seconds, taking a 10-6 lead with 7:31 to go in the game.
After failing to create good shot attempts for the entire quarter, OWU ended their scoring drought with goals from senior midfielder Scotty Rosenthal and Short. The Bishops trailed the Big Red 10-8 with 3:20 remaining in the game.
The Bishops fought back throughout the game but were never able to overcome the deficit.
âWe werenât getting enough time on offense,â said freshman Sam Carpenter, and OWU spectator. âOur defense didnât do a great job of getting the ball back to our offense.â
After desperation set in and OWU pulled their goalie, Denisonâs Blair Farinholt scored to give his team an 11-8 lead, which ended up being the gameâs final score.
Vita and Speidel led the Big Red with three goals each, while Short paced OWU with three goals.
After the loss to Denison, the Bishops had a 5-1 conference record and would finish 6-1 with another conference win against Wittenberg University on April 20. Denison improved to 6-0 in the NCAC and 11-2 overall.
Sophomore John Umbach scored three goals in the contest to help Ohio Wesleyan build an 8-0 lead through three quarters. The Bishops went on to beat Wittenberg with a final score of 11-3.
âIt was good for us to be able to bounce back after having a tough loss early in the week,â Umbach said. âIt really showed that we could leave what happened in the past and move on and come out get another conference win to put us in a great position to win the NCAC tournament.â
Sophomore midfielder Kyle Foster scored all of the Bishopsâ first three goals in the contest against Wittenberg. Midway through the period, it was senior attacker Colin Short who rang up the goal off a Foster assist to expand the Bishop lead to 3-0.
Less than a minute later senior midfielder Pat Bassett would make it 4-0, and the first quarter ended with Ohio Wesleyan holding that lead.
Foster and Helms would continue the scoring for the Bishops into the second quarter, helping OWU run out to an impressive 8-0 lead during the game. Wittenberg would avoid the shutout with a late goal in the fourth quarter.
âThat day our defense was really playing well, and we all seemed to be on the same page of what to do,â McMahon said. âWe knew what we needed to do to get the win, and we went out and executed it.â
The win against Wittenberg clinched Ohio Wesleyan the No. 2 seed in the inaugural NCAC tournament. Ohio Wesleyan hosted third-seeded Wooster in the tournament semifinal at 7 p.m. on Tuesday April 23 at Selby Stadium.
Students were rewarded last Saturday for their hard work and dedication to Ohio Wesleyan at the Golden Bishop Awards. The theme of this yearâs ceremony was âLeaders Who Rock!â The Benes Rooms in Hamilton-Williams Campus Center (HWCC) were decorated with old vinyl records on the tables to match the theme.
The ceremonyâs assistantsâsophomore Lauren Holler, sophomore Memme Onwudiwe and junior Rachel Vinviguerraâwore 1950s-style outfits. Each winner named a song that âmotivatesâ them to keep with the theme. The ceremony celebrated excellence in leadership and service. Over 20 awards were given.
Director of Service Learning Sally Leber won Adviser of the Year award for her significant assistance to Rafiki Wa Afrika (Rafiki).
The nominator sang high praises for Leber, thanking her for her motherly support and mediation during disputes between club members.
Senior Alisa Nammavong, Rafiki president, said she was happy for her club advisor.
âSally has been such an amazing help to me and the rest of my cabinet,â she said. âI canât thank her enough for everything she did for us. I owe so much of our success to Sally.â
Program of the Year went to Culture Fest, sponsored by Horizons International. Presenter Nancy Rutkowski, assistant director of Student Involvement, said the award was earned for the hard work the club put into it and the international food.
Club/Organization of the Year went to the Environment and Wildlife Club (E&W).
The recipient of this award needed to demonstrate strength in programming, membership recruitment and retention, and must have made a significant impact on campus.
Rutkowski said the club has impacted the OWU community through its membersâ hard work in the OWU Free Store, digging through compost and installing âhydration stationsâ in HWCC.
The OWU Spirit Award went to senior Guanyi Yang for his ability to âmake your day by interacting with him,â according to Dean of Students Kimberlie Goldsberry.
The Wesleyan Council on Student Affairs (WCSA)awards for members and friends of WCSA were presented by senior Martin Clark, WCSA president.
Member awards were given to freshman Connor Latz and junior Timothy OâKeeffe; the âFriend of WCSAâ award was given to sophomore Spenser Hickey, The Transcriptâs assistant copy editor.
OâKeeffe, WCSA vice-president, won the Best Overall Member Award for his âhuge personality and ability to flow from one friend group to another seamlessly,â Clark said at the ceremony.
OâKeeffe said he was honored to received the award.
âI have worked very hard in WCSA trying to uphold its values and contribute as much as possible,â he said.
In the program, OâKeeffe said his song, âIn the Midnight Hourâ by Wilson Pickett, signified his hard work because he has âspent countless nights up past the midnight hour to get things done.â
The ceremony ended with the Meek Leadership Awards, which went to seven graduating seniors.
The recipients were âOWU seniors who have demonstrated exceptional leadership service during their years at Ohio Wesleyan and show promise to sustain that commitment throughout their lives,â OWU President Rock Jones said.
The recipients were seniors Kamila Goldin, Andrea Kraus, Gene Sludge, Iftekhar Showpnil, Gregory White, Zeke Brechtel and Cali Cornacchia.
As the academic year nears its end, several students are just beginning work on the Ohio Wesleyan community garden. Located in front of the Student Observatory beside Stuyvesant Hall, the garden has been largely left to the care of several dedicated students. Senior Megan Fris, a member of the Tree House and Environment and Wildlife Club, has taken the garden on as a house project.
âOriginally, former Tree House members received a TiPiT grant to start the community garden the year before I joined, so I took care of it the second yearâ Fris said.
Containing crops like peas, tomatoes, summer squash, cucumbers and watermelon, the gardenâs purpose is to offer fresh, accessible produce for the campus community. Fris said there are two reasons for the project.
âOne reason is that the food we get from the grocery store throughout the year is less nutritious than the food we grow ourselves,â she said. âThis is because many of the produce you pick in the grocery store has been artificially ripened. Second, in order to get fruits and veggies in the middle of winter, we rely on mass transit, which in turn burns fossil fuels and helps contribute to global warming. Eating locally, for these reasons, is extremely important.â
Fris and other students, including junior Michael Cormier, who will take over the project when he returns from Cuba, hope to expand the garden. Fris said the main obstacle is timingâstudents begin work on the garden in the spring but few people can tend it in the summer.
Chartwells Resident District Manager Gene Castelli is working to help students overcome this problem. He said thereâs a possibility of using summer student labor to tend the garden and using the produce in the fall.
âWith the climate being what it is, we are limited as to what will grow outdoors in the colder months, but I know we can expand on what we produce with a better defined program,â he said.
Chartwells has funded the gardenâs initial startup costs and committed to purchase the produce so the garden can be financially sustainable.
The students working on the garden are enthusiastic about Chartwells becoming involved. Though sheâs graduating, Fris said she has high hopes for the garden.
âThe final outcome would perhaps look something like gardens everywhere on campus (where appropriate), with a team of 50 or so students assigned to care for different parts of the garden throughout the summer,â she said.