Mama Charlotte shares message of peace

O'Neal in October 2013. Photo from Mama Charlotte's personal blog
O’Neal in October 2013. Photo from Mama Charlotte’s personal blog

By Kaillie Winston
Transcript Correspondent 

Former Black Panther Charlotte O’Neal came to Ohio Wesleyan University to convey a message of self-determination and community control through her music and poetry.

In 1966, Huey Newton and Bobby Seale established the Black Panther Party (BPP) in Oakland, California. The group defended minority groups from economic, social, and political inequality in America. BPP members aimed to raise equality by organizing committees and programs such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee in 1967 and the Panther’s Free Breakfast for School Children Program in 1969.

The Black Panther Party deteriorated by 1980, but O’Neal still feels strongly about the values they stood for: peace and justice.

O’Neal, who refers to herself as “Mama Charlotte,” explained to a room of OWU students and faculty that the party primarily supported self-determination and community control in inner cities. If students learn to work together and set goals in the classroom, O’Neal said, they could prosper greatly.

“Mama Charlotte has many inspiring stories to tell about her journey and it is a great honor to have her at our school,” senior Taylor Rivkin said.

Additionally, O’Neal is a well-renowned musician and poet from Kansas City. During her time as a Black Panther, O’Neal wrote numerous poems about the struggles of minority oppression, protests, and peace for all. O’Neal continues to share her ideas today through artistic media.

O’Neal became interested in the BPP in the late 1960’s when she first saw founder and chairman Pete O’Neal speaking out about minority rights on television. She became an official member in the late 1969, after learning about the Panther’s Free Breakfast for School Children Program.

“When I discovered the Breakfast for School Children Program, it was over,” she said. “I signed on the dotted line.”

In this program, the BPP installed kitchens throughout America and fed more than 10,000 children each day before school.

The organization remained strong and started liberation movements with many other countries. For example, the United African Alliance Community Center (UAACC), a Panther effort, aimed to help develop well-rounded communities in Tanzania.

O’Neal said many people wrongly assume that the BPP was a black supremacist organization.

“Many people read negative things about the Black Panther Party,” she said, “The black supremacist groups actually disliked us because we worked with everyone.”

“Mama Charlotte” and her husband Pete O’Neal moved to Tanzania in 1971, where they began UAACC in order to spread Black Panther ideals through school systems.

Just five years ago, Mr. and Mrs. O’Neal founded a children’s home in Tanzania, aimed at providing a loving and nurturing environment for orphans. Charlotte O’Neal focuses on artistic involvement and hopes that a proper education will help these children to go far in today’s world.

“If we can spread love and peace, the world will learn to tolerate one another, regardless of gender or race,” she said. “That’s all that matters.”

Memories of the Movement: A Q&A with John Lewis

Lewis after being arrested on May 24, 1961, for a Freedom Ride. Four days before this, Lewis and other activists - both white and black - were beaten with pipes and baseball bats by a white mob in Montgomery, Alabama while state police watched. Photo: teenagefilm.com
Lewis after being arrested on May 24, 1961, for a Freedom Ride.
Four days before this, Lewis and other activists – both white and black – were beaten with pipes and baseball bats by a white mob in Montgomery, Alabama while state police watched. Photo: teenagefilm.com

1955

SH: (The civil rights movement began to reach national attention in the 1950s. In 1955, Emmett Till was brutally murdered in Mississippi; he was born a year after John Lewis. Till’s death and the subsequent acquittal of his murderers gained national attention. That same year in Montgomery, Ala., the NAACP and other civil rights groups launched a boycott lasting more than a year after Rosa Parks was arrested for defying segregation on a city bus.) For my generation, we’ve only seen segregation and what that was like in photographs or films, so what was that like and how did it affect you at the time?

JL: When I was growing up, I would see the signs that said “White Only,” “Colored Only”…I didn’t like it, and I asked my mother, asked my father, my grandparents, my great-grandparents why. They would say, “That’s the way it is. Don’t get in the way, don’t get in trouble.” But I was inspired by Dr. King and Rosa Parks and others to get in what I call good trouble, necessary trouble.

SH: Do you think enough is taught in American education today about the civil rights movement and about the legacy of segregation and of slavery before that?

JL: No, I don’t think we do a necessary job or a good job in letting our young people know what happened and how it happened. I think we need to do a much better job, so never again will we repeat the dark past.

1960

SH: (As a student at Fisk University in Nashville, Tenn., Lewis took part in sit-ins to challenge discrimination at lunch counters in the city.) When you started out in the civil rights movement, you were a college student like we are, you were leading sit-ins to challenge segregation in Nashville. What was that like?

JL: Well, Nashville was the first city that I lived in. I grew up in rural Alabama, and to be in Nashville at the age of 17, I literally grew up by sitting down on those wax counter stools. But before the sit-in, we studied. We studied the way of nonviolence, we studied what Gandhi attempted to do in South Africa, what he accomplished in India. We studied Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience,” we studied what Dr. King was all about in Montgomery. And attending a nonviolent workshop before sitting in, I accepted the way of nonviolence, the way of love, the way of peace, as a way of life, as a way of living. And being in Nashville, sitting in and later going on the Freedom Ride, it made me the person that I am today.

1961

SH:(Lewis was one of the first 13 Freedom Riders who challenged segregation in interstate travel.) Why do you think the Freedom Rides were successful?

JL: The Freedom Rides were successful because the American people saw what was happening and they couldn’t believe it. It educated and sensitized so many people and President Kennedy and his brother Robert Kennedy, the Attorney General, responded to the violence – in Anniston, Ala., where a bus was burned, and to the violence that occurred in Birmingham and later Montgomery and the mass arrests of college students, of professors and religious leaders – almost 400 of us went to jail in Mississippi.

SH: Were you surprised by all the violence that the Freedom Riders experienced during that time?

JL: I was surprised about the violence that occurred, but we had been warned. We had been told that we could be beaten, that we could be arrested, that we could die as part of the Freedom Ride.

SH: And what motivated you to keep going, even possibly risking your life to do so?

JL: I was convinced that we could not allow the threat of violence, the threat of being arrested and put in jail, stop a nonviolent campaign to end segregation and racial discrimination.

1963

SH: (As one of the Big Six civil rights leaders, Lewis was selected to speak at the March on Washington as chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. His planned speech, though, contained references to Sherman’s March during the Civil War – still a source of anger for many white Southerners – and questioned the support of the Kennedy administration. Fearing that these remarks would cost the movement needed support, other leaders pushed him to change his speech.) I’m curious how you feel about that now, so many years later?

JL: Well when I look back on it, I don’t have any strong feeling of objection. There were people like Dr. King and A. Philip Randolph, two of the strong leaders within the March on Washington committee, who suggested that we tone down the speech. They said that we (civil rights leaders and federal officials) have come this far together, let’s stay together. I think it was the right thing to do.

1965

SH: (In 1965 Lewis, as SNCC Chairman, worked with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference to challenge voting discrimination in Alabama. They led a series of marches. In the first, state police attacked the marchers and protester Jimmie Lee Jackson was shot in the stomach protecting his mother. He died eight days later. The second attempt, was led by Lewis and Rev. Hosea Williams of SCLC. They were crossing the Edmund Pettus Bridge when they encountered a line of state police and hastily sworn in deputies.) Can you walk me through what that was like and the violence that followed?

JL: Well, on the day – March 7, 1965 – it was so orderly and so peaceful, 600 of us, I thought we would be arrested and that we would be taken to jail. I was so convinced that we would be arrested that I was wearing a backpack, and in this backpack I had two books. I wanted to have something to read in jail. I had an apple and an orange – I wanted to have something to eat. But we were told by the major of the Alabama state troopers, who said this was an unlawful march and would not be allowed to continue. And Hosea said, “Major, give us a moment to kneel and pray.” And the major said, “Troopers, advance.” And these guys came toward us, beating us with nightsticks, bullwhips, trapping us with horses and releasing the tear gas. I thought I was going to die. I thought I saw death.

SH: I’ve read that you re-walk the route the march was planned for each year. I’m curious what that experience is like to you.

JL: Well, to go back – and I went back just about three weeks ago – to go back there, it’s always so uplifting. It’s so inspiring, especially to take young people and to take members of Congress who have never been to Selma, Alabama, never been to Birmingham, never been to Montgomery. To go back to these historic sites and observe and meet some of the people who participated in it is very moving. You go back and you have to rekindle the spirit that we still have work to do, that we must not stop now.

SH: What was the highest point of your experience in the civil rights movement?

JL: I think the finest moment for me was when we walked across that bridge the third time and made it from Selma to Montgomery. (March 7, 1965 was the second time civil rights workers tried to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge.) And when Martin Luther King spoke, and then President Johnson spoke, we knew it was a matter of time before the Voting Rights Act would be passed and signed into law. And I was there – he gave me one of the pens that he used to sign the act.

1968

SH: (While they had finally achieved the right to vote, the civil rights movement continued, though it lacked the strength it had in past years. Lewis left SNCC in 1966 but remained involved, helping the presidential campaign of Robert Kennedy, brother of John Kennedy and former attorney general. Martin Luther King was working to build support for his Poor People’s Campaign and went to Memphis, Tenn., to support striking sanitation workers. On April 3 King delivered his “Mountaintop” sermon, describing how he’d seen the promised land, even though he may not reach it himself. The next evening he was shot dead by a sniper.) What was the lowest point of the movement that you felt you experienced?

JL: To witness the loss of people that I got to know, people that I met. I was with Robert Kennedy when we heard that Dr. King had been assassinated. I was in Indianapolis, Ind., campaigning with him on April 4, 1968. Dr. King was my inspiration, my hero, my friend, almost like a big brother and to lose this man changed my life. And I said to myself…“Well, we still have Bobby Kennedy.” Then two months later Robert Kennedy was killed. I admired Robert Kennedy, loved him, and I often think if Dr. King and Robert Kennedy lived the country and the world would be a different place.

Students spiritually connect to nature

By Catie Beach
Transcript Correspondent

Twelve Ohio Wesleyan students spent their spring breaks trailblazing the forests of South Carolina’s Blue Ridge Mountains, working to conserve the forest’s trails and campsite while connecting with their inner spirituality.

The weeklong hike is an annual backpacking trip organized by The Wilderness Ministry, a part of the Chaplain’s office. The theme of this year’s trek, titled “The Ground We Walk,” explored mankind’s relationship with the earth and how humans take care of it.

The group arrived in Sumpter National Forest after a day’s drive, spending the first four days of their trek hiking, camping, and exploring.

“The terrain was very beautiful–lot’s of waterfalls and varied species,” said sophomore Reilly Reynolds.

Before starting their service work on the trail, the group spent their first days getting in touch with their spiritual sides.

Their leaders isolated each hiker on the trail for a few hours at a time, allowing them to decompress and contemplate nature in private.

“I spent some time barefoot, feeling the textures of the ground,” Reynolds said. “I just really got to experience nature in an interesting way. I’ve always held a very high level of respect for my natural surroundings, but the trip heightened that even more.”

The trek, lead by Coalition for Christian Outreach counselor Jamie Zackavitch and alumnae Haley Figlestahler (’13), was a first time backpacking experience for many of the students.

“The trip really challenged my endurance,” said sophomore Scott Woodward. “We were each carrying 20 to 30 pounds on our backs. By the second and third days not only were you feeling the hike of your day, but the day before and the day before that.”

The last two days of the trip consisted of trail maintenance; a service which helps create safe trails and reduce the effects of hiker traffic on the environment.

“We would hike along the trails and cut any branches that were in the way of hikers and if we came across a stream without rocks we would move them there to create bridges,” Woodward said. “We fixed campsites up, raked leaves and took down unregulated ones to reduce negative human impact.”

The participating students’ service work helped them achieve a greater understanding of their role in environment conservation as well as a newfound appreciation for The Wilderness Ministry as a campus resource, according to Reynolds.

“I’d recommend wilderness treks to anyone,” she said.

“It’s a great lesson in teamwork, respecting physical abilities, and letting go of the stresses of everyday life to look at the bigger picture.”

Students learn about lives of migrants, Zapatistas

Students on the Modernity & Colonialism travel learning course admire an ancient Mayan ruin while on their trip to Chiapas, Mexico. Photo by John Stone-Mediatore
Students on the Modernity & Colonialism travel learning course admire an ancient Mayan ruin while on their trip to Chiapas, Mexico. Photo by John Stone-Mediatore

Bob Gitter, professor of economics, said he suggested a trip to Mexico so students in his Mexican Migration Experience travel learning course could see why people migrate and the impact that migration has on those who stay behind.

“I wanted the students to better understand the causes and consequences of migration.  It is not enough to teach the concepts through readings, videos and lectures,” Gitter said.

“Going from Delaware to Mexico is like going from black and white to color.  The light and bright colors make one feel so alive.”

Senior Sarah Hartzheim, who went on the Travel Learning Course, said the people are proud of migrants because they have to work so hard to save the money used to migrate.

“I studied the incomes and expenses of families, and finding the $2000 USD required to pay a coyote to take someone across the border is impossible for many,” Hartzheim said.

Hartzheim also said they migrate for the prospect of new possibilities such as owning businesses and land and although the people felt fortunate to have migrated to the U.S., no one she spoke with had wanted to stay in the country.

“Many said they would migrate again for a few years if it was easier to do so; but they all loved their towns and their way of life, and only went to the U.S. as a way to improve their lives in Mexico- not to stay there permanently,” she said.

Professor of philosophy Shari Stone-Mediatore’s spring break travel learning course, “Modernity & Colonialism,” examines how European Enlightenment notions of the links between European modernity and colonialism.

Stone-Mediatore said she chose to travel to a Zapatista community in Chiapas, Mexico with nine students and co-chaperone professor John Stone-Mediatore because the Zapatistas have challenged the authority of U.S. and European-dominated forms of progress.

According to Stone-Mediatore, Zapatistas are indigenous groups in Chiapas, Mexico, who own historic territories and govern their own communities. They consider the official Mexican government to be an illegal government, because the Mexican government has cancelled the constitutional amendment that protects indigenous communal land.

According to senior Jessica Brewer, the group spent the trip living as the Zapatista do.

“We slept in hammocks, ate only what was local, cooked over open fires, used squat toilets, bathed in the river.  It was a very refreshing lifestyle for the week that we were there,” Brewer said.

The Zapatistas have established their own system of local democracies across Chiapas, with ordinary men and women regularly rotating on and off governing councils and with substantial autonomy for each community.

“I believed that we can learn a great deal from the people living in Zapatista communities about democracy, diversity, and human dignity that cannot be reduced to book knowledge,” Stone-Mediatore said.

“Instead of seeking state power, the Zapatistas have called on people across Mexico to set up their own grassroots democracies, ‘good governments,’ to replace the official illegal government,” she said.

Stone-Mediatore said the Zapatistas are known for covering their faces with black masks or bandanas.

A reason for this is to protect their identities from paramilitary groups, who are paid by the state to terrorize and assassinate Zapatistas.

“Symbolically, it also represents the idea that the leaders can be anyone; and it provokes the question of who is really masked, the campesinos who hide their faces with ski masks, or the governments that hide behind paramilitary groups and mercenaries?” she said.

Global Grab: Talking Turkey, Korea Fires Away and Egyptian Elections

The Issue: Turkey

Once considered one of the more stable countries in the Middle East, tensions have been rising in Turkey over the past few weeks.

Recently, the government blocked access to Twitter and YouTube because audio recordings talking about the security situation in Syria were uploaded to the sites.

According to the New York Times, Turkey’s Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, told supporters at a campaign rally that “YouTube was being used in a dirty tricks campaign against his government before local elections.”

Prime Minister Erdogan faced sweeping antigovernment protests last summer, but his party was still reelected on Sunday.

His party, the Islamist Justice and Development Party won large numbers in the local elections, larger than the 39 percent A.K.P. won in the 2009 local elections.

According to the New York Times, there are also upcoming elections, like the presidential election in the summer, and parliamentary elections next year. The elections will determine the political future for both Prime Minister Erdogan and his political party.

The Issue: Korea

Whenever the spotlight shines away from North Korea, the nation always know how to get its international focus back.

North Korea has been doing live-fire exercises near the South Korean maritime border.

Instead of sitting idly by, South Korea returned fire.

According to CNN, a defense spokesman from South Korea said, “We are not shooting at North Korea, just shooting into the sea.”

According to the New York Times, this exchange of fire was the most serious episode along that border since an artillery duel which occurred in 2010.

These types of military exchanges are not new, but the tensions between these two countries are ramping up yet again.

The Issue: Egypt

With rising tensions in Egypt, the presidential elections will take place on May 26 and 27. Egypt’s army chief, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi announced he would run for president, but he had to resign from his post in order to do so.

According to CNN, el-Sisi is quite popular among Egyptians who supported the deposition of President Mohmed Morsey of the Muslim Brotherhood, who was the first freely elected leader in Egypt.

However, el-Sisi is greatly disliked by the Islamist opposition, who see him as the person who led the coup against an elected leader, according to CNN.

Smoking committee shouldn’t light up new policy too hastily

A debate that got rather heated and resulted in little meaningful compromise three years ago was resurrected this week.

Yesterday was the first meeting of a new Wesleyan Council on Student Affairs committee of students administrators and service providers (including Chartwells and Aramark) set to the task of fulfilling the 2011 resolution to make Ohio Wesleyan’s campus smoke-free.

The reasons behind the resolution are certainly sound. WCSA is rightly concerned about the negative health effects of tobacco and second-hand smoke, and the members’ interest in the campus’s health is commendable.

But I am very hesitant to align myself with any sort of claim that a smoke-free initiative is the correct way to do this.

First, it is rather unclear, at least in the current student body’s consciousness, what “smoke-free” actually means. Does it mean no one on campus will be allowed to smoke any kind of legal tobacco product, or tobacco substitute (like an electronic cigarette), under any circumstances? Or would WCSA follow many other universities and create designated smoking areas?

Materials WCSA sent out soliciting committee members indicated the organization wasn’t certain which of those solutions it would pursue, or if either was the right one. I hope determining a definition of “smoke-free” is one of the committee’s first tasks. If a definition exists in the 2011 resolution, I think it’s unfair to apply it to a student body whose makeup is almost entirely different from when the resolution was passed.

Vagueness is one of the most odious weaknesses a policy can have. A lack of specific definitions undermines a policy’s authority.

In creating these definitions and politices that follow from them, there is another thing WCSA must be mindful of — the insidious class implications a smoking ban or limiation would have in an environment like OWU’s campus.

Students are not the only ones who smoke. We often see people without whom the university would not be able to function smoking at any given place around campus. These are the people who cook and serve us our food, clean our residential and academic buildings, and maintain our landscaping and infrastructure. They are the most important people to this place. Without them, it would fall apart.

For many, it seems, smoking is a brief break from long days of work that more than likely doesn’t pay very well, from the criticism of the bourgeois students who do not know what that work is like. To take that stress relief away seems almost cruel.

In the same vein, not every student is bourgeois. There are students who work multiple jobs — not two five-hour-a-week gigs on campus, but multiple part- or full-time jobs — to study at OWU. And there are students who may smoke to relieve the stress of other troubles. Perhaps it’s not ideal in a narrow health sense, but it’s unfair of privileged people to deem that stress relief technique unworthy and subject to student regulation.

For these reasons, I am strongly skeptical of the notion that any sort of smoking regulation would achieve the health objectives behind it. Prohibitive, paternalistic policy is never a good answer — especially within this class dynamic. If WCSA decides it is, it ought to provide profuse resources to aid compliance with the policy.

We need more Mount Rushmores — somewhere else

The Crazy Horse monument, under construction in South Daktoa's Black Hills. Photo: media.npr.org
The Crazy Horse monument, under construction in South Daktoa’s Black Hills. Photo: media.npr.org

While it was completed in 1941, the iconic status Mount Rushmore has in modern American culture is a perfect image of the farce that is the common view of our whitewashed history.

In answering the question “Who made America?” Rushmore shows four white men, all presidents: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.

Yes, these were influential leaders in our nation’s history, and presidents should be remembered. But they were not the pure mythic figures we’ve made them into, and it was not just white men who built the United States into the democracy we see it as today.

On March 31, I had the incredible privilege of meeting one such person who risked his life for democracy, here in the United States — Rep. John Lewis.

In grade school and most of high school, my American history classes focused on presidents and legislative procedure and the just wars we fought, with the occasional film and obligatory explanation of who Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks were each February.

I didn’t hear about John Lewis until junior year of high school, reading Howard Zinn’s alternative history of the United States. While a lot of history books talk about the March on Washington, Zinn’s one of the few who points out the behind the scenes division between young leaders such as Lewis and federal officials in the Kennedy administration who were hesitant to take direct action to protect civil rights workers.

My education also focused on King and Parks, leaving out many of the other leaders — A. Philip Randolph, Medgar Evers, Bayard Rustin, James Lawson, Stokely Carmichael, Malcolm X, Fannie Lou Hamer and Shirley Chisholm — and almost all the martyrs.

The Black Power movement and Black Panther Party that followed the most well known years of the movement, 1963-1965, are often presented negatively without context or omitted entirely. They’re often criticized as being violent and advocating the overthrow of the government, but if you really read the history they had far more justification to do so than, say, some wealthy British colonists in 1775.

So yes, it’s unquestionable that the four presidents have shaped the United States (although having two slave-owning presidents and the man credited as the one who ended slavery is a problematic combination) but they are far from the only ones deserving recognition on that level.

But wherever they are recognized, it shouldn’t be anywhere near the current Mount Rushmore, as I noted in the headline.

The tragic icing on the cake of our whitewashed history regarding Mount Rushmore is the fact that we stole the land it’s built on, as we or those before us stole most of the land in the United States.

In 1868, the Treaty of Fort Laramie granted the land Mount Rushmore is now carved into to the Lakota permanently — not that we had the right to give them their own land.

Less than a decade later, we took the land by force.

I don’t know where a similar monument to the heroes who fought for democracy on behalf of those who aren’t white, cisgender, straight and middle class (or richer) men, and it’s not my place to say who should be on it.

But we need to do something to better remember the abolitionists (and not just the white ones), the leaders of the worker’s rights movement, the civil rights movement, the women’s and LGBTIQA rights movement (and not just the white ones there, either), the Latin American and Asian American and Native American equality movements.

None of these movements of the 1960s and 1970s have finished their work; there’s still a lot to be done. While we memorialize and mythicize Martin Luther King, what’s not focused on — as one attendee pointed out following Rep. Lewis’ speech — is his final work in trying to lead a Poor People’s Campaign that would draw attention to income inequality experienced by people of all races, ethnicities and genders.

As Lewis said during our roundtable discussion, the world would be a very different place had King and Robert Kennedy not been assassinated in 1968.

But they were, and it’s up to us to keep their work going.

The first step is education on our genuine and often unpleasant national history, and it’s primary sources — memoirs like Lewis’ “Walking with the Wind” and collections of speeches and writings by historians like Zinn — that really provide the perspective textbooks lack.

In preparing for my interview with John Lewis, I watched PBS’ series “Eyes on the Prize” and a documentary by Zinn, “The People Speak.” I highly recommend both.

Artist talks give new insight to southwest exhibit

Artists featured in the “New Art/New Mexico” exhibit in the Ross Art Museum visited campus to shed some light on the history and inspirations for their work.

Both featured artists, Victor Goler and Anita Rodriguez, said their art is a medium for social commentary.

“Art is a way of bringing social change without violence,” Rodriguez said.

Goler specializes in the art of Santos, which are wooden depictions of religious figures and themes.

During his talk, Goler went through a brief history of Santos in Latin America in conjunction with some of his own work.

Goler creates Bultos, 3-D carvings of saints, in way that stays true to the traditional iconography of a specific saint, but in an interesting way. He said his worked in his family’s conservation studios growing up, and would work on the saints, replacing fingers and other pieces.

He graduated college with a major in graphic design and advertisement and didn’t expect to have a career as an artist.

“I always resisted being an artist,” Goler said. “It just worked out.”

Rodriguez, a painter, explained the traditions and attitudes surrounding death in Mexico, in particular the cult of Santisima Muerte, Our Lady of Death.

Santisima Muerte, often depicted as a skeleton, is normally the patron for criminals or the marginalized, and promises to grant a good death to those that pray to her.

In her paintings, Santisima Muerte is often placed above the people.

Rodriguez said this is because “she is for all of us and I picture her towering above country borders.”

“Everyone always asks why I put skeletons in my work,” she said.

“I grew up with these beliefs and feel that it is perfectly natural to use skeletons within my paintings.”

Female empowerment comes in many colors

‘The Vagina Monologues,’ a re-occuring movement

‘The Vagina Monologues’ cast rises for women’s empowerment in Grey Chapel on March 29. Photo by Caleb Dorfman
‘The Vagina Monologues’ cast rises for women’s empowerment in Grey Chapel on March 29. Photo by Caleb Dorfman

By Megan Dill
Transcript Reporter

Last Saturday, students of Ohio Wesleyan preformed “The Vagina Monologues” to give voice to women’s stories and struggles.

“I hope that women find a sense of empowerment and that all genders find that they were educated about sexuality and women’s experience,” said senior Claire Hackett, producer and co-director of the production.

For the third consecutive year at OWU, students gathered to perform the set of monologues based on women’s various experiences with sex, rape, orgasm, birth and more.

Before the monologues began, Pitch Black, OWU’s female a capella group, preformed renditions of Macklemore’s “Can’t Hold Us,” Gloria Gaynor’s “I Will Survive,” and  a mash-up “Tonight I’ll be Your Sweet Dream.”

Sophomore Pitch Black member, Emma Sparks, said their performance was incorporated into the show to promote female empowerment through music.

“Although women a capella groups that sing non-traditional music are increasing, they are still a newer phenomenon and are not as common as male groups,” Sparks said.

“It was another way to show that women not only have the ability, but have the passion and drive to do anything.”

After Pitch Black’s performance, the monologue performers took the stage and recited 14 short pieces.

The stories mostly focus on a realization or change in how a person feels about their vagina according to Hackett.

“In ‘The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could’ a young woman experiences a lot of trauma to her vagina, including rape when she was 10, but is changed by an enlightening sexual experience with an older woman,” Hackett said.

“But in ‘My Vagina Was My Village,’ a woman tells of how beautiful and wonderful her vagina used to be, and what is like after genital mutilation.”

For sophomore performer Elizabeth Raphael, reciting a monologue meant being able to feel comfortable with talking about vaginas and sexuality.

“I think the overall message of the show is that women from all over the world has every right to be proud of their vaginas, and any act that makes women think otherwise needs to be stopped,” Raphael said.

Yasmin Radzi, a sophomore performer, said being a part of the production helped her to gain closure from a negative sexual experience in her past.

“Being in ‘Vagina Monologues’ has really helped me grow, has helped me to find closure, and has helped me to gain strength,” she said.

‘Butterfly Confessions,’ a new tradition of diversity

Freshman Lissette Gonzalez performs in 'Butterfly Confessions.' Photo by Noah Manskar, courtesy of butterflyconfessions.com
Freshman Lissette Gonzalez performs in ‘Butterfly Confessions.’ Photo by Noah Manskar, courtesy of butterflyconfessions.com

By Jija Dutt
Transcript Reporter

Thirty-seven women of color, ten different monologues and a packed audience. History was made last Friday as Ohio Wesleyan became the first college to perform Yetta Young’s “Butterfly Confessions.”

“Butterfly Confessions” is “a love letter to women of color that reveals heartfelt emotions about intimacy, sexual responsibility and overcoming adversity,” according to the Facebook page for the event.

Though written for black women only, OWU’s production was modified to include a diverse group of women in order to properly represent the multinational student population on campus.

Junior Khristina Gardner was one of five directors for the play and said that it would not have been possible without the play’s producer, senior Claire Hackett.

“We are all women of color and for Claire to reach out to all of us to share the heartfelt stories within the monologues was so wonderful,” Gardner said.

“She was determined to take steps towards making a change on this campus and to bring light to various issues and she did just that.”

Gardner said she was very excited about the opportunity for the voices of black women to “finally be heard.”

Her goal for the play was to make the “women feel comfortable and form a connection with the monologues that they performed.”

Senior Madeline Miguel a part of the diverse cast said that her ethnicity is comprised of Japanese, Filipina and White.

“As someone who is of mixed ethnicity its difficult for me to feel like a fit in,” said Miguel.

“I chose to be a part of this production because I think it’s important for women of color to have a voice and a presence on our campus.”

Miguel said her only challenge was that she “felt a little strange and a bit left out” because the monologues were all written for black women.

“I couldn’t relate to black women, but I could relate to struggles of being a minority woman,” Miguel said.

“The directors were excellent at encouraging us that all of us were an important part of this production.”

Miguel added that she was particularly interested in the combination of light hearted, funny monologues and the more serious hard-hitting topics of HIV/AIDS and child abuse.

“It showed the audience a part of a culture with which we coexist, but rarely recognize or notice. It was amusing, sad and all too real,”  said freshman Jessica Sanford of the performance.

From scheduling conflicts to the nervousness of being a first time director, Gardner said she was glad with the way the show turned out.

“I want to see ‘Butterfly Confessions’ grow,” she added. “I want to see the women who chose to be involved with ‘Butterfly Confessions’ grow. I want to see the Ohio Wesleyan community as a whole grow from this production as well.”

The first collegiate performance of ‘Confessions’ concluded with a standing ovation from the audience of Grey Chapel.