Ohio Wesleyan University junior and Transcript Reporter, Caleb Dorfman, created a Facebook page dedicated to the lives and stories of the people who reside in Delaware, Ohio.
He says he decided to document local people as a way to hopefully break down the wall between OWU students and Delaware citizens.
âThis is my idea to connect students and residents of Delaware, to end that division,â Dorfman states in the description section of his page.
Since he created the page on March 31 Dorfman has posted over 20 photographs and quotes from people around the community; from barbershop employees, to baby-sitters. This page follows a recent trend that has been evolving over the past few years, beginning with blogger Brandon Stanton cataloguing eccentric citizens of New York City.
âHumans of New Yorkâ, or more commonly known as HONY began in November of 2010 and has only escalated in popularity since.
Since then, cities and towns everywhere have joined the bandwagon of publishing photos and snippets of interviews with citizens.
We, as the Transcript staff, have decided to dedicate weekly space to Dorfmanâs documentation of the Delaware community.
One or two of these interviews and photos will appear as feature photos on the A&E page.
The Baseball team currently stands at 6-18 this season and 1-7 in the NCAC, and is looking to change their outcome as the season draws to a close.
Despite getting a shaky start in their season, Head coach Tyler Mott and senior Sean Vollenweider both said they are hopeful about the teamâs upcoming games.
According to Mott, the team is âoff to an unusually slow start,â adding that the weather played a big role in their challenging season thus far, as it was difficult to get into a routine.
The unpredictable weather caused the team to have to cancel several of its games, and the extreme colds and rains have made it difficult for them to play when their games are not cancelled.
In addition to problems created by bad weather, the team has struggled with finding a lineup that allows for cohesion and accommodates the playersâ strengths.
âEvery year itâs [difficult] finding the right lineup,â Mott said.
Vollenweider said heâs feeling some pressure as one of the only two seniors on the team.
âPersonally, I would like to improve my play on the field,â Vollenweider said. âMy hitting can be better and being one of two seniors, I want to make sure I am being the best leader I can possibly be.â
Additionally Vollenweider said the team needs to maintain focus and deliver âenergy and intensityâ to each game.
âOur number one goal since the beginning has been to win the NCAC championship and that is still the outcome we hope for,â he said.
Mott expressed his confidence in the team, saying heâs seen their strengths in previous seasons and know they can play stronger than they are this spring.
âI hope we reach our full potential,â Mott said. âEverybody knows weâre a better team than what we have shown in the last couple of weeks.â
After four years, the smoking debate returns to campus
The debate on Ohio Wesleyanâs smoking policies has been relit by WCSAâa Smoking Initiative Committee. This week, the Committee held an open discussion on smoking policies and effects and sent out a survey to gauge students, faculty and staffsâ opinions on the issue.
Committee co-chairs junior Lauren Holler, president of WCSA and sophomore Hannah Henderson, residential representative of the student conduct committee, said the survey will ask questions involving studentsâ opinions on designated smoking areas on campus, where students smoke now and whether an all-out ban on smoking or tobacco products should be considered.
Henderson said there are two sets of goals for the Committee. The first set, called âstretch goalsâ involve making the campus completely smoke free.
âThese are bold and probably impossible,â Henderson said.
The second set of goals, or âmanageable goalsâ involve providing alternative products for smokers, such as nicotine patches or gum at the Student Health Center and designated outdoor areas for smoking.
Henderson said the goal is to have the policies, whatever they end up being, voted on during the 2014 spring semester, adopted during the 2014 fall semester and implemented by spring 2015.
Previous attempts went up in smoke
The WCSA began the discussion of a smoke-free campus in spring 2010. At the time, the Healthy Bishop Initiative was formed to help OWU provide a healthier environment and the WCSA adopted a goal to decrease the effects of second-hand smoke.
WCSA created an educational campaign about the need for smokers to stand a minimum of 20 feet away from buildings and moving cigarette receptacles to the appropriate distance. These policies were in accordance with the state law.
WCSA also created a compromise in which the residential side of campus would adhere to the mandatory distance away from buildings and public areas such as the JAYwalk and academic side would eventually transition to smoke-free zones by 2013.
âThere was a push for that conversation to continue but that didnât happen,â Holler said.
Holler said that WCSA does not know if there is a âright answerâ for the issue but the Committee will hold open meetings every Wednesday.
âWeâre allowed to debate. The purpose is to understand each other and find some common ground,â Holler said
Health Concerns
Sophomore Hannah Henderson, co-chair of the Smoking Initiative Committee, said she experienced the negative effects of smoking at a young age. When Henderson was a child, her father died of lung cancer caused by smoking and the effects of second hand smoke. She said her mother has struggled with a smoking addiction and it has affected her family.
âNo one has to go through what I went through and lose a loved one to second-hand smoke,â she said.
Henderson presented statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the effects of secondhand smoke, including a 20-30 percent increase in heart disease and lung cancer risk for those who are exposed to secondhand smoke.
âIf cigarette smoking was illegal the world would be a much better place,â Henderson said.
Gene Castelli, senior director of Chartwells, said the Committeeâs decision will be supported by him and his employees, though several of them smoke.
âFrom a safety standard to a food standard, it should be eliminated,â Castelli said.
Sophomore Matt McCord said he understands the health implications behind the potential smoking ban because his family member had lung cancer.
However, he is concerned about the negative effect a ban could have on smokers.
âSmoking, for some, is a coping mechanism,â McCord said. âWhat would the withdraw effects be?â
Safety concerns
âI definitely agree with being far away from buildings,â sophomore Alyssa Jones said. âBut am I going to need to walk to Spring St. to smoke?â
Jones said since most of the buildings on campus are in close proximity to one another, she fears for her safety at night and does not want to have to go too far in inclement weather.
âIf there were smoking areas that were farther away that were covered, I would be willing to walk out of my dorm,â Jones said.
Another concern is the time Public Safety would have to spend enforcing the smoking policies. Jones said Public Safety has more important issues, especially on weekends.
âIâd rather PS focus on protecting us or doing things like breaking up fights,â Jones said.
Senior Kate Johnson, member of the Modern Foreign Language House, said she is concerned about the safety issues involved with students having to step far away from the campus to smoke at night.
âI wouldnât be opposed to having lit designated places in open areas, theyâll be fewer safety issues,â Johnson said.
Henderson said a solution for this could be the creation of smoking cabins, or open, roofed structures that would be built at least 20 feet away from campus buildings.
Henderson said schools like OSU have already adopted the idea of smoking cabins and they could be a good compromise for students here.
Potential problems of a ban
Junior Jackie Cole said although smokers will want to cooperate, an all-out ban on smoking wonât work and cause smokers to feel like their rights are being violated.
âI just recently became an actual smoker, and completely making it smoke free might make it a little more tense,â Cole said.
Cole also said she was recently at the University of Central Florida, where smoking is banned. She said the policies there are nearly impossible to follow and caused more problems than solutions for smokers.
âI feel like people couldnât follow it here,â Cole said.
Junior Liz Dickson, member of WoHo, said an all-out ban on smoking would disrupt social activities on campus.
âWe bond over smoking hookah, I would kind of be concerned that we wouldnât be allowed to do that,â Dickson said.
Dickson also said that the ban, if enforced, should not be a 24 hour ban and should at least allow smokers to smoke where they want outside at night when there are less people around them.
Despite a desire from program directors to have more male participation, Travel Learning courses continue to be significantly more utilized by female students.
Darrell Albon, Director of International Students, said the skewed participation is a national trend.
For more than 10 years, study abroad participation rates have been consistently 65 percent female and 35 percent male.
âThis is magnified a bit at OWU by the gender distributionâ59 percent of our grads are women,â Albon said.
Albon said OWU tends to have slightly more male participants studying abroad than the national average.
He said gender distribution in the majors affects the gender distribution in programs that reach abroad.
Robert Harmon, Travel Learning program director, said while the destinations of trips play a role in who applies for them, more women apply than men no matter the destination.
âGiven the wide variety of destinations, I donât think that itâs a matter of no trips going where men want to go,â Harmon said.
Harmon said that the academic aspect of the application process also has little to do with the skewed gender distribution in programs.
While GPA is taken into consideration for selection for the programs, students with a wide range of GPAs participate and men with high GPAs apply for trips at a much lower rate than women with comparable GPAs.
Harmon said faculty play a large role in Travel Learning Course promotion and recruitment and would like to see more male participants.
âAll the professors to whom Iâve spoken tell me theyâd like to have a more balanced applicant pool in terms of gender,â Harmon said.
Bob Gitter, professor of economics, said his Mexican Migration Experience travel learning course, which took place over spring break, comprised of only female students.
The cost of the trip was roughly $2,500 with students paying half of the amount and OWU picking up the balance.
Gitter said the cost may have affected the ability of some students to go but not necessarily male students.
âI think the males at OWU are missing out on a wonderful opportunity,â Gitter said.
Albon said data suggests that one of the most effective ways to increase male participation rates in programs abroad is to have a direct and detailed advising aimed at men who have shown an interest.
âIâd like to see every student have a significant off-campus experience — one that articulates well with their academic and personal goals,â he said.
There have been renewed peace talks between Israel and Palestine recently. As a cynic, I roll my eyes because I highly doubt that anything will be done this time.
But as someone who grew up in a Jewish household and was surrounded by Judaism growing up, I actually hope the peace talks will go through â but not the way most people would expect.
When I was younger, I went to Hebrew School every Wednesday afternoon and Sunday morning. We would learn about the Torah and all of the wonders that occurred. We also spent a lot of time on the subject of Israel.
That only intensified for me when I went to a private Jewish day school for seventh and eighth grade. Oh, donât get me started on my ten years of attending a Jewish overnight camp and everything I learned about Israel there.
In all of these situations, we were taught about the perfection that Israel is and how we must protect it from being separated into two states.
I was taught that Jerusalem belonged to the Jews because of everything we went through as a people. I was taught that Jerusalem was exclusively ours; people were allowed to visit, but it was exclusively for the Jewish people. When I went to Israel on my eighth grade class trip, I was transfixed by Israelâs beauty and the richness of culture that was entrenched in everyday life.
Once I hit high school and was effectively removed from that bubble, I was still a strong supporter of Israel. Due to some events in my life, I decided to become an atheist, but still be culturally Jewish.
However, as I got older and started really paying attention to the news, I started to discover some unsightly truths about Israel. I found out about its human rights record against Palestinians, which greatly upset me. I remember thinking to myself, âI never learned about that in Hebrew School.â
I started doing more research on my own, and I discovered that I didnât support Israel.
I didnât like how dependent it was on the United States; I didnât like how it treated people in the settlements; and I definitely didnât like how it denied international aid to those who desperately needed it.
Once I started telling people I no longer blindly supported Israel, I received mostly negative comments.
The area of Milwaukee where I live has a decently sized Jewish population, so my opinion was one of dissent. I would try and tell relatives where I was coming from, but they would just shoot me down, telling me I didnât know what I was talking about. I would then support my argument with facts, but they wouldnât believe it.
This really is the first time Iâm discussing my unfavorable view of Israel in a large forum setting, since I donât feel like defending myself every time I decided to give my educated opinion.
So, during this latest round of peace talks, I support the two-state solution. I just find it ironic that a group of people such as the Jews, who have been horribly oppressed for all of history, to enforce similar actions on other oppressed minorities.
The largest war to ever engulf the globe is happening right outside, but the inhabitants of George Bernard Shawâs âHeartbreak House,â are more concerned with their love affairs.
In âHeartbreak House,â the feminist writer depicts the course of a day in a mansion in Sussex, England.
Over the course of the show characterâs become fixated on romance while ignoring that they are living in the middle World War I.
Ohio Wesleyanâs theatre and dance departmentâs rendition of the play was directed by Professor Elane Denny-Todd.
Denny-Todd said that after 22 years of working at OWU, she was excited to finally produce one of Shawâs works.
The cast of âHeartbreak Houseâ is comprised of ten students from various class years.
Making the first appearance on stage was Ellie Dunn, played by senior Jenea Dominguez.
Dominguezâs character struggles throughout the show with the decision of whom she will marry. Eventually she settles on the absent-minded Captain Shotover, played by junior Luke Steffen.
Dominguez said she auditioned for the play because she wanted to perform something of Shawâs as well as work with Denny-Todd.
Senior Kati Sweigard takes on the role of Hesione Hushabye. Sweigardvdescribes her character as having an âintense personality and a ton of confidence.â
Sweigard said that Shaw intended to write the play as an examination of wartime upper-class British society.
Junior Hannah Simpson, who plays Lady Ariedne Utterwood, agreed with Sweigard. Simpson added that Shawâs play is a critique on how self-absorbed people can be.
âShaw wrote this play to point out the follies of mankind, particularly those of the upper-class, on the eve of WWI,â Simpson said.
âInstead of being concerned with the consequences that will inevitably rise from war, the characters in âHeartbreak Houseâ fill their minds with trivial matters,â Simpson continued. âSuch as who gets the last word in an argument, or not receiving a âproperâ greeting when he or she has entered the house.â
Athletic Director, and former OWU Head baseball Coach Roger Ingles and his wife Jo, an award winning journalist for Ohio Public Radio, were honored Sat April 5 at. Littick Field for the dedication and hard work they have given to OWU athletics. Donations from alumni Mark and Ginny Shipps, Dale and Marilyn Bruce, and Chris McComish and his wife were used in honor of the Inglesâ to replace the backstopâs netting system, add new fencing and a new warning track. The Athletic Director said it was an honor to see his wife honored for her years as an honorary piece of the OWU community.
âI was honored that these donors felt moved enough to make our current athletes experience even better through their generous gifts,â he said. âIf I contributed in some small way that is great and the event was special but it really was a recognition of the Ohio Wesleyan spirit that lives within our alumni each and every day.â
Near the end of an already emotional speech on campus, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) delivered a passionate call for unity.
âIt doesnât matter whether weâre black or white, Latino, Asian-American or Native American, it doesnât matter whether weâre Democrats or Republicans, it doesnât matter whether weâre straight or gay – weâre one people, one family,â Lewis said.
Lewis came to campus to receive an honorary doctorate degree, and as one of the âBig Sixâ civil rights leaders, he has seen firsthand the violence that can follow division.
âCongressman John Lewis was on the frontlines of virtually every struggle for racial justice in the 1960s,â said Professor Michael Flamm of the universityâs history department.
Flamm, professor Paula White and Terree Stevenson â95, all nominated Rep. Lewis for the honorary degree. White is chair of the education department and Stevenson is director of the Office of Multicultural Student Affairs.
In their nomination form, submitted last academic year, the three say that Lewis âis one of the towering figures of the modern civil rights movement.â
âThe path he chose was brutally hard at times, but the results historic,â said Michael Long, chairperson of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously approved Lewisâ degree. âThis is exactly the type of educational experience we seek to provide at Ohio Wesleyan.â
Lewis received his honorary degree from university President Rock Jones and Rev. Myron McCoy â77, an at-large trustee.
âSir Isaac Newton said, âIf I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants,ââ McCoy said in his introduction. âCongressman John Lewis is such a giant.â
Lewis rose to prominence within the civil rights movement with his involvement in sit-ins in Nashville, challenging segregated restaurants. Despite beatings and arrests, he and other activists, trained by Rev. James Lawson, continually practiced nonviolence in the style of Mahatma Gandhi and Henry David Thoreau.
âI literally grew up by sitting down on those wax counter stools,â Lewis said in an interview before the speech.
His lecture, following the presentation of his degree, focused on his experiences in the civil rights movement and modern politics and his belief in the need for unity and reconciliation rather than bitterness and anger.
Jones said that the lecture provided âa terrific evening.â
âI was thrilled so many people were here and so thrilled we were able to hear him speak so powerfully and eloquently about his life and about what it can mean for all of us,â Jones said.
âThere were some great questions, people identifying with his life and with the commitments heâs made and thinking about the work thatâs still to be done.â
Senior Madeleine Leader was among the students who asked questions of Lewis following his speech, describing how members of the black community and allies have struggled to make their voices heard on campus.
âI was wondering if you can offer any advice so that we donât get burned out, we donât become hostile, we donât become bitter because obviously we want to create positive change for people in the future,â Leader asked.
âContinue to be hopeful, continue to be optimistic and continue to negotiate,â Lewis replied. âNever give up.â
âI think that his approach is extremely important,â Leader said afterward.
âItâs something that we as students today donât entirely understand because we want everything, now now now. I think embracing his message of love and not getting bitter is only going to help us.â
Even though theyâll be graduating, Leader said they hope to âget in good trouble,â as Lewis put it.
Junior Brianna Robinson, co-director of Ohio Wesleyanâs performance of âButterfly Confessionsâ – a series of readings on the experiences of black women – said she thought the event was âabsolutely amazing.â
âI kind of wish that (Lewis) knew what we just did over the weekend, but I think itâs amazing that we got to do it and then this is probably one of the greatest events that OWU has ever put on,â Robinson said.
âI think itâs amazing that we got to share the same timeframe of him being here.â
While it was completed in 1941, the iconic status Mount Rushmore has in modern American culture is a perfect image of the farce that is the common view of our whitewashed history.
In answering the question âWho made America?â Rushmore shows four white men, all presidents: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.
Yes, these were influential leaders in our nationâs history, and presidents should be remembered. But they were not the pure mythic figures weâve made them into, and it was not just white men who built the United States into the democracy we see it as today.
On March 31, I had the incredible privilege of meeting one such person who risked his life for democracy, here in the United States â Rep. John Lewis.
In grade school and most of high school, my American history classes focused on presidents and legislative procedure and the just wars we fought, with the occasional film and obligatory explanation of who Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks were each February.
I didnât hear about John Lewis until junior year of high school, reading Howard Zinnâs alternative history of the United States. While a lot of history books talk about the March on Washington, Zinnâs one of the few who points out the behind the scenes division between young leaders such as Lewis and federal officials in the Kennedy administration who were hesitant to take direct action to protect civil rights workers.
My education also focused on King and Parks, leaving out many of the other leaders â A. Philip Randolph, Medgar Evers, Bayard Rustin, James Lawson, Stokely Carmichael, Malcolm X, Fannie Lou Hamer and Shirley Chisholm â and almost all the martyrs.
The Black Power movement and Black Panther Party that followed the most well known years of the movement, 1963-1965, are often presented negatively without context or omitted entirely. Theyâre often criticized as being violent and advocating the overthrow of the government, but if you really read the history they had far more justification to do so than, say, some wealthy British colonists in 1775.
So yes, itâs unquestionable that the four presidents have shaped the United States (although having two slave-owning presidents and the man credited as the one who ended slavery is a problematic combination) but they are far from the only ones deserving recognition on that level.
But wherever they are recognized, it shouldnât be anywhere near the current Mount Rushmore, as I noted in the headline.
The tragic icing on the cake of our whitewashed history regarding Mount Rushmore is the fact that we stole the land itâs built on, as we or those before us stole most of the land in the United States.
In 1868, the Treaty of Fort Laramie granted the land Mount Rushmore is now carved into to the Lakota permanently â not that we had the right to give them their own land.
Less than a decade later, we took the land by force.
I donât know where a similar monument to the heroes who fought for democracy on behalf of those who arenât white, cisgender, straight and middle class (or richer) men, and itâs not my place to say who should be on it.
But we need to do something to better remember the abolitionists (and not just the white ones), the leaders of the workerâs rights movement, the civil rights movement, the womenâs and LGBTIQA rights movement (and not just the white ones there, either), the Latin American and Asian American and Native American equality movements.
None of these movements of the 1960s and 1970s have finished their work; thereâs still a lot to be done. While we memorialize and mythicize Martin Luther King, whatâs not focused on â as one attendee pointed out following Rep. Lewisâ speech â is his final work in trying to lead a Poor Peopleâs Campaign that would draw attention to income inequality experienced by people of all races, ethnicities and genders.
As Lewis said during our roundtable discussion, the world would be a very different place had King and Robert Kennedy not been assassinated in 1968.
But they were, and itâs up to us to keep their work going.
The first step is education on our genuine and often unpleasant national history, and itâs primary sources â memoirs like Lewisâ âWalking with the Windâ and collections of speeches and writings by historians like Zinn â that really provide the perspective textbooks lack.
In preparing for my interview with John Lewis, I watched PBSâ series âEyes on the Prizeâ and a documentary by Zinn, âThe People Speak.â I highly recommend both.