‘People of Delaware’ comes to page seven

“When you sign up to be a truck driver, they tell you that you’ll see the country. That’s bullshit. You see the side of the highway.” Photo by Caleb Dorfman
“When you sign up to be a truck driver, they tell you that you’ll see the country. That’s bullshit. You see the side of the highway.”
Photo by Caleb Dorfman

Ohio Wesleyan University junior and Transcript Reporter, Caleb Dorfman, created a Facebook page dedicated to the lives and stories of the people who reside in Delaware, Ohio.

He says he decided to document local people as a way to hopefully break down the wall between OWU students and Delaware citizens.

“This is my idea to connect students and residents of Delaware, to end that division,” Dorfman states in the description section of his page.

Since he created the page on March 31 Dorfman has posted over 20 photographs and quotes from people around the community; from barbershop employees, to baby-sitters. This page follows a recent trend that has been evolving over the past few years, beginning with blogger Brandon Stanton cataloguing eccentric citizens of New York City.

“Humans of New York”, or more commonly known as HONY began in November of 2010 and has only escalated in popularity since.

Since then, cities and towns everywhere have joined the bandwagon of publishing photos and snippets of interviews with citizens.

We, as the Transcript staff, have decided to dedicate weekly space to Dorfman’s documentation of the Delaware community.

One or two of these interviews and photos will appear as feature photos on the A&E page.

Baseball looks to improve NCAC record

Top: Junior JJ Buckey throws a strike to make it full count against Cincinatti-Clermont at Littick Field on April 10. Photo by Jane Suttmeier
Junior JJ Buckey throws a strike to make it full count against Cincinatti-Clermont at Littick Field on April 10.
Photo by Jane Suttmeier

The Baseball team currently stands at 6-18 this season and 1-7 in the NCAC, and is looking to change their outcome as the season draws to a close.

Despite getting a shaky start in their season, Head coach Tyler Mott and senior Sean Vollenweider both said they are hopeful about the team’s upcoming games.

According to Mott, the team is “off to an unusually slow start,” adding that the weather played a big role in their challenging season thus far, as it was difficult to get into a routine.

The unpredictable weather caused the team to have to cancel several of its games, and the extreme colds and rains have made it difficult for them to play when their games are not cancelled.

In addition to problems created by bad weather, the team has struggled with finding a lineup that allows for cohesion and accommodates the players’ strengths.

“Every year it’s [difficult] finding the right lineup,” Mott said.

Vollenweider said he’s feeling some pressure as one of the only two seniors on the team.

“Personally, I would like to improve my play on the field,” Vollenweider said. “My hitting can be better and being one of two seniors, I want to make sure I am being the best leader I can possibly be.”

Additionally Vollenweider said the team needs to maintain focus and deliver “energy and intensity” to each game.

“Our number one goal since the beginning has been to win the NCAC championship and that is still the outcome we hope for,” he said.

Mott expressed his confidence in the team, saying he’s seen their strengths in previous seasons and know they can play stronger than they are this spring.

“I hope we reach our full potential,” Mott said. “Everybody knows we’re a better team than what we have shown in the last couple of weeks.”

No butts about it

Illustration by Ellin Youse
Illustration by Ellin Youse

After four years, the smoking debate returns to campus

 

The debate on Ohio Wesleyan’s smoking policies has been relit by WCSA’a Smoking Initiative Committee. This week, the Committee held an open discussion on smoking policies and effects and sent out a survey to gauge students, faculty and staffs’ opinions on the issue.

Committee co-chairs junior Lauren Holler, president of WCSA and sophomore Hannah Henderson, residential representative of the student conduct committee, said the survey will ask questions involving students’ opinions on designated smoking areas on campus, where students smoke now and whether an all-out ban on smoking or tobacco products should be considered.

Henderson said there are two sets of goals for the Committee. The first set, called “stretch goals” involve making the campus completely smoke free.

“These are bold and probably impossible,” Henderson said.

The second set of goals, or “manageable goals” involve providing alternative products for smokers, such as nicotine patches or gum at the Student Health Center and designated outdoor areas for smoking.

Henderson said the goal is to have the policies, whatever they end up being, voted on during the 2014 spring semester, adopted during the 2014 fall semester and implemented by spring 2015.

Previous attempts went up in smoke

The WCSA began the discussion of a smoke-free campus in spring 2010. At the time, the Healthy Bishop Initiative was formed to help OWU provide a healthier environment and the WCSA adopted a goal to decrease the effects of second-hand smoke.

WCSA created an educational campaign about the need for smokers to stand a minimum of 20 feet away from buildings and moving cigarette receptacles to the appropriate distance. These policies were in accordance with the state law.

WCSA also created a compromise in which the residential side of campus would adhere to the mandatory distance away from buildings and public areas such as the JAYwalk and academic side would eventually transition to smoke-free zones by 2013.

“There was a push for that conversation to continue but that didn’t happen,” Holler said.

Holler said that WCSA does not know if there is a “right answer” for the issue but the Committee will hold open meetings every Wednesday.

“We’re allowed to debate. The purpose is to understand each other and find some common ground,” Holler said

Health Concerns

Sophomore Hannah Henderson, co-chair of the Smoking Initiative Committee, said she experienced the negative effects of smoking at a young age. When Henderson was a child, her father died of lung cancer caused by smoking and the effects of second hand smoke. She said her mother has struggled with a smoking addiction and it has affected her family.

“No one has to go through what I went through and lose a loved one to second-hand smoke,” she said.

Henderson presented statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the effects of secondhand smoke, including a 20-30 percent increase in heart disease and lung cancer risk for those who are exposed to secondhand smoke.

“If cigarette smoking was illegal the world would be a much better place,” Henderson said.

Gene Castelli, senior director of Chartwells, said the Committee’s decision will be supported by him and his employees, though several of them smoke.

“From a safety standard to a food standard, it should be eliminated,” Castelli said.

Sophomore Matt McCord said he understands the health implications behind the potential smoking ban because his family member had lung cancer.

However, he is concerned about the negative effect a ban could have on smokers.

“Smoking, for some, is a coping mechanism,” McCord said. “What would the withdraw effects be?”

Safety concerns

“I definitely agree with being far away from buildings,” sophomore Alyssa Jones said. “But am I going to need to walk to Spring St. to smoke?”

Jones said since most of the buildings on campus are in close proximity to one another, she fears for her safety at night and does not want to have to go too far in inclement weather.

“If there were smoking areas that were farther away that were covered, I would be willing to walk out of my dorm,” Jones said.

Another concern is the time Public Safety would have to spend enforcing the smoking policies. Jones said Public Safety has more important issues, especially on weekends.

“I’d rather PS focus on protecting us or doing things like breaking up fights,” Jones said.

Senior Kate Johnson, member of the Modern Foreign Language House, said she is concerned about the safety issues involved with students having to step far away from the campus to smoke at night.

“I wouldn’t be opposed to having lit designated places in open areas, they’ll be fewer safety issues,” Johnson said.

Henderson said a solution for this could be the creation of smoking cabins, or open, roofed structures that would be built at least 20 feet away from campus buildings.

Henderson said schools like OSU have already adopted the idea of smoking cabins and they could be a good compromise for students here.

Potential problems of a ban

Junior Jackie Cole said although smokers will want to cooperate, an all-out ban on smoking won’t work and cause smokers to feel like their rights are being violated.

“I just recently became an actual smoker, and completely making it smoke free might make it a little more tense,” Cole said.

Cole also said she was recently at the University of Central Florida, where smoking is banned. She said the policies there are nearly impossible to follow and caused more problems than solutions for smokers.

“I feel like people couldn’t follow it here,” Cole said.

Junior Liz Dickson, member of WoHo, said an all-out ban on smoking would disrupt social activities on campus.

“We bond over smoking hookah, I would kind of be concerned that we wouldn’t be allowed to do that,” Dickson said.

Dickson also said that the ban, if enforced, should not be a 24 hour ban and should at least allow smokers to smoke where they want outside at night when there are less people around them.

 

Women lead study abroad enrollment

Professor Bob Gitter poses with his all-women travel learning course in Mexico. Photo from Jessica Sanford
Professor Bob Gitter poses with his all-women travel learning course in Mexico. Photo from Jessica Sanford

Despite a desire from program directors to have more male participation, Travel Learning courses continue to be significantly more utilized by female students.

Darrell Albon, Director of International Students, said the skewed participation is a national trend.

For more than 10 years, study abroad participation rates have been consistently 65 percent female and 35 percent male.

“This is magnified a bit at OWU by the gender distribution—59 percent of our grads are women,” Albon said.

Albon said OWU tends to have slightly more male participants studying abroad than the national average.

He said gender distribution in the majors affects the gender distribution in programs that reach abroad.

Robert Harmon, Travel Learning program director, said while the destinations of trips play a role in who applies for them, more women apply than men no matter the destination.

“Given the wide variety of destinations, I don’t think that it’s a matter of no trips going where men want to go,” Harmon said.

Harmon said that the academic aspect of the application process also has little to do with the skewed gender distribution in programs.

While GPA is taken into consideration for selection for the programs, students with a wide range of GPAs participate and men with high GPAs apply for trips at a much lower rate than women with comparable GPAs.

Harmon said faculty play a large role in Travel Learning Course promotion and recruitment and would like to see more male participants.

“All the professors to whom I’ve spoken tell me they’d like to have a more balanced applicant pool in terms of gender,” Harmon said.

Bob Gitter, professor of economics, said his Mexican Migration Experience travel learning course, which took place over spring break, comprised of only female students.

The cost of the trip was roughly $2,500 with students paying half of the amount and OWU picking up the balance.

Gitter said the cost may have affected the ability of some students to go but not necessarily male students.

“I think the males at OWU are missing out on a wonderful opportunity,” Gitter said.

Albon said data suggests that one of the most effective ways to increase male participation rates in programs abroad is to have a direct and detailed advising aimed at men who have shown an interest.

“I’d like to see every student have a significant off-campus experience — one that articulates well with their academic and personal goals,” he said.

Identity and ideology don’t always mix

There have been renewed peace talks between Israel and Palestine recently. As a cynic, I roll my eyes because I highly doubt that anything will be done this time.

But as someone who grew up in a Jewish household and was surrounded by Judaism growing up, I actually hope the peace talks will go through — but not the way most people would expect.

When I was younger, I went to Hebrew School every Wednesday afternoon and Sunday morning. We would learn about the Torah and all of the wonders that occurred. We also spent a lot of time on the subject of Israel.

That only intensified for me when I went to a private Jewish day school for seventh and eighth grade. Oh, don’t get me started on my ten years of attending a Jewish overnight camp and everything I learned about Israel there.

In all of these situations, we were taught about the perfection that Israel is and how we must protect it from being separated into two states.

I was taught that Jerusalem belonged to the Jews because of everything we went through as a people. I was taught that Jerusalem was exclusively ours; people were allowed to visit, but it was exclusively for the Jewish people. When I went to Israel on my eighth grade class trip, I was transfixed by Israel’s beauty and the richness of culture that was entrenched in everyday life.

Once I hit high school and was effectively removed from that bubble, I was still a strong supporter of Israel. Due to some events in my life, I decided to become an atheist, but still be culturally Jewish.

However, as I got older and started really paying attention to the news, I started to discover some unsightly truths about Israel. I found out about its human rights record against Palestinians, which greatly upset me. I remember thinking to myself, “I never learned about that in Hebrew School.”

I started doing more research on my own, and I discovered that I didn’t support Israel.

I didn’t like how dependent it was on the United States; I didn’t like how it treated people in the settlements; and I definitely didn’t like how it denied international aid to those who desperately needed it.

Once I started telling people I no longer blindly supported Israel, I received mostly negative comments.

The area of Milwaukee where I live has a decently sized Jewish population, so my opinion was one of dissent. I would try and tell relatives where I was coming from, but they would just shoot me down, telling me I didn’t know what I was talking about. I would then support my argument with facts, but they wouldn’t believe it.

This really is the first time I’m discussing my unfavorable view of Israel in a large forum setting, since I don’t feel like defending myself every time I decided to give my educated opinion.

So, during this latest round of peace talks, I support the two-state solution. I just find it ironic that a group of people such as the Jews, who have been horribly oppressed for all of history, to enforce similar actions on other oppressed minorities.

All is fair in love, war and ‘Heartbreak House’

Cast members of Ohio Wesleyan’s rendition of George Bernard Shaw’s period piece “Heartbreak House.” Photo by Megan Pinto for Communications
Cast members of Ohio Wesleyan’s rendition of George Bernard Shaw’s period piece “Heartbreak House.” Photo by Megan Pinto for Communications

The largest war to ever engulf the globe is happening right outside, but the inhabitants of George Bernard Shaw’s “Heartbreak House,” are more concerned with their love affairs.

In “Heartbreak House,” the feminist writer depicts the course of a day in a mansion in Sussex, England.

Over the course of the show character’s become fixated on romance while ignoring that they are living in the middle World War I.

Ohio Wesleyan’s theatre and dance department’s rendition of the play was directed by Professor Elane Denny-Todd.

Denny-Todd said that after 22 years of working at OWU, she was excited to finally produce one of Shaw’s works.

The cast of “Heartbreak House” is comprised of ten students from various class years.

Making the first appearance on stage was Ellie Dunn, played by senior Jenea Dominguez.

Dominguez’s character struggles throughout the show with the decision of whom she will marry. Eventually she settles on the absent-minded Captain Shotover, played by junior Luke Steffen.

Dominguez said she auditioned for the play because she wanted to perform something of Shaw’s as well as work with Denny-Todd.

Senior Kati Sweigard takes on the role of Hesione Hushabye. Sweigardvdescribes her character as having an “intense personality and a ton of confidence.”

Sweigard said that Shaw intended to write the play as an examination of wartime upper-class British society.

Junior Hannah Simpson, who plays Lady Ariedne Utterwood, agreed with Sweigard. Simpson added that Shaw’s play is a critique on how self-absorbed people can be.

“Shaw wrote this play to point out the follies of mankind, particularly those of the upper-class, on the eve of WWI,” Simpson said.

“Instead of being concerned with the consequences that will inevitably rise from war, the characters in ‘Heartbreak House’ fill their minds with trivial matters,” Simpson continued. “Such as who gets the last word in an argument, or not receiving a ‘proper’ greeting when he or she has entered the house.”

First family of Wesleyan sports honored with baseball renovations

Photos by Jane Suttmeier

Athletic Director, and former OWU Head baseball Coach Roger Ingles and his wife Jo, an award winning journalist for Ohio Public Radio, were honored Sat April 5 at. Littick Field for the dedication and hard work they have given to OWU athletics. Donations from alumni Mark and Ginny Shipps, Dale and Marilyn  Bruce, and Chris McComish and his wife were used in honor of the Ingles’ to replace the backstop’s netting system, add new fencing and a new warning track. The Athletic Director said it was an honor to see his wife honored for her years as an honorary piece of the OWU community.

“I was honored that these donors felt moved enough to make our current athletes experience even better through their generous gifts,” he said. “If I contributed in some small way that is great and the event was special but it really was a recognition of the Ohio Wesleyan spirit that lives within our alumni each and every day.”

Civil rights leader receives honorary degree

Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) spoke to the Ohio Wesleyan community on March 31. Lewis is the last surviving speaker of the March on Washington. Photo by Spenser Hickey
Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) spoke to the Ohio Wesleyan community on March 31. Lewis is the last surviving speaker of the March on Washington. Photo by Spenser Hickey

Near the end of an already emotional speech on campus, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) delivered a passionate call for unity.

“It doesn’t matter whether we’re black or white, Latino, Asian-American or Native American, it doesn’t matter whether we’re Democrats or Republicans, it doesn’t matter whether we’re straight or gay – we’re one people, one family,” Lewis said.

Lewis came to campus to receive an honorary doctorate degree, and as one of the “Big Six” civil rights leaders, he has seen firsthand the violence that can follow division.

“Congressman John Lewis was on the frontlines of virtually every struggle for racial justice in the 1960s,” said Professor Michael Flamm of the university’s history department.

Flamm, professor Paula White and Terree Stevenson ’95, all nominated Rep. Lewis for the honorary degree. White is chair of the education department and Stevenson is director of the Office of Multicultural Student Affairs.

In their nomination form, submitted last academic year, the three say that Lewis “is one of the towering figures of the modern civil rights movement.”

“The path he chose was brutally hard at times, but the results historic,” said Michael Long, chairperson of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously approved Lewis’ degree. “This is exactly the type of educational experience we seek to provide at Ohio Wesleyan.”

Lewis received his honorary degree from university President Rock Jones and Rev. Myron McCoy ‘77, an at-large trustee.

“Sir Isaac Newton said, ‘If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants,’” McCoy said in his introduction. “Congressman John Lewis is such a giant.”

Lewis rose to prominence within the civil rights movement with his involvement in sit-ins in Nashville, challenging segregated restaurants. Despite beatings and arrests, he and other activists, trained by Rev. James Lawson, continually practiced nonviolence in the style of Mahatma Gandhi and Henry David Thoreau.

“I literally grew up by sitting down on those wax counter stools,” Lewis said in an interview before the speech.

His lecture, following the presentation of his degree, focused on his experiences in the civil rights movement and modern politics and his belief in the need for unity and reconciliation rather than bitterness and anger.

Jones said that the lecture provided “a terrific evening.”

“I was thrilled so many people were here and so thrilled we were able to hear him speak so powerfully and eloquently about his life and about what it can mean for all of us,” Jones said.

“There were some great questions, people identifying with his life and with the commitments he’s made and thinking about the work that’s still to be done.”

Senior Madeleine Leader was among the students who asked questions of Lewis following his speech, describing how members of the black community and allies have struggled to make their voices heard on campus.

“I was wondering if you can offer any advice so that we don’t get burned out, we don’t become hostile, we don’t become bitter because obviously we want to create positive change for people in the future,” Leader asked.

“Continue to be hopeful, continue to be optimistic and continue to negotiate,” Lewis replied. “Never give up.”

“I think that his approach is extremely important,” Leader said afterward.

“It’s something that we as students today don’t entirely understand because we want everything, now now now. I think embracing his message of love and not getting bitter is only going to help us.”

Even though they’ll be graduating, Leader said they hope to “get in good trouble,” as Lewis put it.

Junior Brianna Robinson, co-director of Ohio Wesleyan’s performance of “Butterfly Confessions” – a series of readings on the experiences of black women – said she thought the event was “absolutely amazing.”

“I kind of wish that (Lewis) knew what we just did over the weekend, but I think it’s amazing that we got to do it and then this is probably one of the greatest events that OWU has ever put on,” Robinson said.

“I think it’s amazing that we got to share the same timeframe of him being here.”

Related – Memories of the Movement: A Q&A with John Lewis

We need more Mount Rushmores — somewhere else

The Crazy Horse monument, under construction in South Daktoa's Black Hills. Photo: media.npr.org
The Crazy Horse monument, under construction in South Daktoa’s Black Hills. Photo: media.npr.org

While it was completed in 1941, the iconic status Mount Rushmore has in modern American culture is a perfect image of the farce that is the common view of our whitewashed history.

In answering the question “Who made America?” Rushmore shows four white men, all presidents: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.

Yes, these were influential leaders in our nation’s history, and presidents should be remembered. But they were not the pure mythic figures we’ve made them into, and it was not just white men who built the United States into the democracy we see it as today.

On March 31, I had the incredible privilege of meeting one such person who risked his life for democracy, here in the United States — Rep. John Lewis.

In grade school and most of high school, my American history classes focused on presidents and legislative procedure and the just wars we fought, with the occasional film and obligatory explanation of who Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks were each February.

I didn’t hear about John Lewis until junior year of high school, reading Howard Zinn’s alternative history of the United States. While a lot of history books talk about the March on Washington, Zinn’s one of the few who points out the behind the scenes division between young leaders such as Lewis and federal officials in the Kennedy administration who were hesitant to take direct action to protect civil rights workers.

My education also focused on King and Parks, leaving out many of the other leaders — A. Philip Randolph, Medgar Evers, Bayard Rustin, James Lawson, Stokely Carmichael, Malcolm X, Fannie Lou Hamer and Shirley Chisholm — and almost all the martyrs.

The Black Power movement and Black Panther Party that followed the most well known years of the movement, 1963-1965, are often presented negatively without context or omitted entirely. They’re often criticized as being violent and advocating the overthrow of the government, but if you really read the history they had far more justification to do so than, say, some wealthy British colonists in 1775.

So yes, it’s unquestionable that the four presidents have shaped the United States (although having two slave-owning presidents and the man credited as the one who ended slavery is a problematic combination) but they are far from the only ones deserving recognition on that level.

But wherever they are recognized, it shouldn’t be anywhere near the current Mount Rushmore, as I noted in the headline.

The tragic icing on the cake of our whitewashed history regarding Mount Rushmore is the fact that we stole the land it’s built on, as we or those before us stole most of the land in the United States.

In 1868, the Treaty of Fort Laramie granted the land Mount Rushmore is now carved into to the Lakota permanently — not that we had the right to give them their own land.

Less than a decade later, we took the land by force.

I don’t know where a similar monument to the heroes who fought for democracy on behalf of those who aren’t white, cisgender, straight and middle class (or richer) men, and it’s not my place to say who should be on it.

But we need to do something to better remember the abolitionists (and not just the white ones), the leaders of the worker’s rights movement, the civil rights movement, the women’s and LGBTIQA rights movement (and not just the white ones there, either), the Latin American and Asian American and Native American equality movements.

None of these movements of the 1960s and 1970s have finished their work; there’s still a lot to be done. While we memorialize and mythicize Martin Luther King, what’s not focused on — as one attendee pointed out following Rep. Lewis’ speech — is his final work in trying to lead a Poor People’s Campaign that would draw attention to income inequality experienced by people of all races, ethnicities and genders.

As Lewis said during our roundtable discussion, the world would be a very different place had King and Robert Kennedy not been assassinated in 1968.

But they were, and it’s up to us to keep their work going.

The first step is education on our genuine and often unpleasant national history, and it’s primary sources — memoirs like Lewis’ “Walking with the Wind” and collections of speeches and writings by historians like Zinn — that really provide the perspective textbooks lack.

In preparing for my interview with John Lewis, I watched PBS’ series “Eyes on the Prize” and a documentary by Zinn, “The People Speak.” I highly recommend both.